No. 10 feet is 10 feet at either speed. :lol:etimh wrote:And won't ten feet in 24fps be much shorter (time-wise) than 18fps?
Take the example of shooting a person walking down the street. Let's say I have two cameras, one shooting exactly ten feet of film at 24fps and one shooting exactly ten feet at 18fps, getting the same shot. Obviously, the ten feet in the 24fps camera will burn up the film faster, and, end of shot. The 18fps camera will continue to shoot for a few more seconds, and, end of shot.audadvnc wrote:Oh, alright. At 24fps you have about 33 seconds, at 18fps about 44 seconds.
Makes me wanna call Bush El Presidente from now on, like an South-American dictator generallisimo.audadvnc wrote:In the words of our beloved President, I believe you "misunderestimate the situation."
I intend to shoot a card at the beginning of my part reading technical information including my framerate. I'd suppose since we'll get it telecined, Mojo could take care about each participant's framerate in NLE.audadvnc wrote:As I understand, the project originator intends to transfer this footage at 18fps and a 10' section will play for 44 seconds. So if you shoot at 18fps also, your characters will move at normal speed. But no matter what speed you shoot at, your 10' will have a 44 second duration in the final presentation.
Of course, I understand this. But this has no meaning in relationship to the scenario I outlined above. I said, assuming that everything was conformed to realistic speed, meaning that everyone walked down the street at a real, naturalistic pace, more action time would transpire in the 18fps shot and thus the sequence would be longer. Pretty sure this is correct.audadvnc wrote:Assuming film playback is done at 18fps. a strip of film shot at 18fps will play at normal speed, whereas a strip of film shot at 24fps will play slow.
Conversely, for film projected at 24fps. a strip of film shot at 18fps will play fast, whereas a strip of film shot at 24fps will play at normal speed.
Where did you get this from? The last comment from mojohey on the other thread here:audadvnc wrote:As I understand, the project originator intends to transfer this footage at 18fps and a 10' section will play for 44 seconds.
That's exactly my point. If people shoot at 24fps (because they are under the impression that "it doesn't matter"), and the final editing maintains a 44 second segment length in the final edit, their footage will look slow. And I, for one, don't want this in my segment.audadvnc wrote:So if you shoot at 18fps also, your characters will move at normal speed. But no matter what speed you shoot at, your 10' will have a 44 second duration in the final presentation.
But won't this mess with the image if your framerate has to be "taken care of" (either by speeding up or slowing down)? Why not just decide uniformly before we get too far down the line?tlatosmd wrote:I'd suppose since we'll get it telecined, Mojo could take care about each participant's framerate in NLE.
Ok. BANG!etimh wrote: Take the example of shooting a person walking down the street.
Ooops you meant with a camera.Let's say I have two cameras, one shooting exactly ten feet of film at 24fps and one shooting exactly ten feet at 18fps, getting the same shot.
yes it's me.flatwood wrote:is that you with the cam in the first pic???
so, were you shooting this footage for the "Pass The Cart" project or are these photos from another unrelated project?yes it's me.
and it's me also the one on the bike.
It was the first time for me that I was also acting in a movie of mine, probably inspired by Jacques Tati's jour de fete? So I shot some takes (also one from the bike itself) and some were shot by Carlo (the guy you can see his feets on the left of the second pic).
the actress is Monica (one of my favourite actress, of course), pics were from Lorenzo, many thanks to him
