No More E64T?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
aj
Senior member
Posts: 3556
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:15 pm
Real name: Andre
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: No More E64T?

Post by aj »

super-8-epiphany wrote:
things need to change in the Super 8 hobby- or else there will be no hobby soon. The old carts I've been shooting up, have $1 and $3 prices on them. They need to get prices of film for new carts down around $5-6 each- otherwise no one is going to continue doing this.

when the entry level becomes $30 to shoot 3.3 minutes of film, it becomes unaffordable for the average guy. We complain about $3 or $5 a gallon gas- when shooting film is $10 for one minute.
Do a reality check and try some price-indexing. Your cheap films are from 25-30 years past. Money doubles every 7 years. It is the economy. Prices on a niche market or not going to be better then when the product was mainstream.

BTW $3-5 per gallon is not that expensive. It has been too cheap too long. Gasoline usage (miles/gallon) lowering targets for 2020 in USA are ridiculious. These goals are history for like 20 years in other parts of the world.
Kind regards,

André
User avatar
MIKI-814
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:53 pm
Real name: Miguel
Location: BILBAO, Basque Country, EU
Contact:

Re: No More E64T?

Post by MIKI-814 »

super-8-epiphany wrote: when the entry level becomes $30 to shoot 3.3 minutes of film, it becomes unaffordable for the average guy. We complain about $3 or $5 a gallon gas- when shooting film is $10 for one minute.
This hobby has aprox the very same price it had 30 or 40 years ago. Translated to actual money value, it's the same price.

OK, video has always been very cheap since it was introduced compared to film and we got used to the cheap of video, but 8mm is as affordable as it was before.
User avatar
reflex
Senior member
Posts: 2131
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:25 am
Real name: James Grahame
Location: It's complicated
Contact:

Re: No More E64T?

Post by reflex »

aj wrote:BTW $3-5 per gallon is not that expensive. It has been too cheap too long. Gasoline usage (miles/gallon) lowering targets for 2020 in USA are ridiculous. These goals are history for like 20 years in other parts of the world.
AJ: The USA (and my native Canada) will be forced to make radical shifts in consumption well before 2020. People will react somewhat rationally to the increasing price of fuel by purchasing smaller vehicles, especially if the US dollar continues to drop relative to other currencies.

Unfortunately, Super 8 film is a discretionary expense for most people. When personal finances are tight it is much easier to do without film than food.
www.retrothing.com
Vintage Gadgets & Technology
User avatar
onsuper8
Posts: 644
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: North West, UK
Contact:

Post by onsuper8 »

..I could probably survive from my expanding waistline for a good few weeks, I can still buy film then!
marc
Senior member
Posts: 1931
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 12:01 am
Real name: Marc

Re: No More E64T?

Post by marc »

super-8-epiphany wrote: things need to change in the Super 8 hobby- or else there will be no hobby soon. The old carts I've been shooting up, have $1 and $3 prices on them. They need to get prices of film for new carts down around $5-6 each- otherwise no one is going to continue doing this.
when the entry level becomes $30 to shoot 3.3 minutes of film, it becomes unaffordable for the average guy. We complain about $3 or $5 a gallon gas- when shooting film is $10 for one minute.


Yeah, not going to happen. And I sometimes wonder how much Kodak cares about Super 8 anyway!
fred621962
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Paris, France
Contact:

Post by fred621962 »

Hi,

A point of view from a poor european guy :
Yes, Super8 shooting is becoming expensive, compared to video. But alas, film is also more and more difficult to buy, and fewer labs accept them for developing. It means Super8 is becoming limited to passionate filmmakers.

Just a word about 9.5mm format.
It's been created in the 20's, by a firm named Pathé in france. Soon absorbed by Kodak, Pathé no longer provides film for years and years. I mean there's no official way to buy Pathé film for more than 40 years ... BTW, a handful of crazy men are still shooting 9.5mm films, they cope with rarity with every mean they have. And they love it.

From my point of view, Super8 shooting is going to follow this path, being only used by foolish people who LOVE it, and will pay (or do) anything they can afford to let the passion burn.
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by Will2 »

I have to concur with the gentleman that said costs are about the same now as they were. We are too used to video as a cost structure and standard.

Perhaps there is an additional cost now since we usually transfer to video and there are multiple levels and options there, but if you actually cut and project your films costs are probably about the same as 1975 if you account for inflation. That's pretty good considering how much less film is shot these days.

It is what it is, not cheap, but beautiful (or beautifully ugly depending on the stock). If costs are an issue I'd suggest only shooting a few rolls on special occations and save up to do all processing and transfers once or twice a year.
woods01
Posts: 822
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 3:09 am
Location: Vancouver

Post by woods01 »

aj wrote:Didn't someone from Kodak report that they sell more cine-film than ever? 16mm and 35mm of course but handling S8 along side isn't that more demanding.
That 'fact' seems to get bounced around this board a lot but the question is
which stocks are making these record sales? I bet its the print stocks that
are creating these sales figures. With the major movies being released on thousands of screens opening weekend thats a helluvalota print film.
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by Will2 »

woods01 wrote:That 'fact' seems to get bounced around this board a lot but the question is which stocks are making these record sales? I bet its the print stocks that are creating these sales figures. With the major movies being released on thousands of screens opening weekend thats a helluvalota print film.
Vision2 500T is by far the best selling 35mm stock. Not sure how overall sales are however. Probably something that Kodak doesn't want to put out there.

While HD video certainly has more and more uses, the proliferation of cable and satellite channels also means overall content demand has increased and many still will rely on film in the U.S. for the near future at least for dramas. The investment in quality pays off as these shows are sold overseas for many years.
David M. Leugers
Posts: 1632
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 12:42 am

Post by David M. Leugers »

BTW $3-5 per gallon is not that expensive. It has been too cheap too long. Gasoline usage (miles/gallon) lowering targets for 2020 in USA are ridiculious. These goals are history for like 20 years in other parts of the world.
Oil out of the ground costs between $3 to $5 per barrel to produce. Producing gasoline from crude oil in a process called "cracking" (if I recall right) produces 250 gallons of gas plus many other products from each gallon of crude.... The international banksters must love you.



David M. Leugers
aj
Senior member
Posts: 3556
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:15 pm
Real name: Andre
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by aj »

David M. Leugers wrote:
BTW $3-5 per gallon is not that expensive. It has been too cheap too long. Gasoline usage (miles/gallon) lowering targets for 2020 in USA are ridiculious. These goals are history for like 20 years in other parts of the world.
Oil out of the ground costs between $3 to $5 per barrel to produce. Producing gasoline from crude oil in a process called "cracking" (if I recall right) produces 250 gallons of gas plus many other products from each gallon of crude.... The international banksters must love you.



David M. Leugers
A barrel of 155 liter of oil (almost $100 currently) does not produce 900 liters gasoline. Unless diluted (with what, water? :) )

The price to market is dictated by economic parameters as scarcity. If people or nations fight over it it becomes more expensive. The costs to the user should also include the costs the car usage inflicts on society and environment . There is no entitlement to cheap transport. This is of course a matter of opinion and politics :)
Kind regards,

André
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..

Post by S8 Booster »

A 42-U.S. gallon barrel of crude oil provides slightly more than 44 gallons of petroleum products. This gain from processing the crude oil is similar to what happens to popcorn, it gets bigger after it is popped.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/energyfacts ... ml#Howused"]http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/energyfacts ... ml#Howused

Image

Image
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
Angus
Senior member
Posts: 3888
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:22 am
Contact:

Post by Angus »

I do laugh at Americans upset at $3 a gallon for gas....try nigh on $8 that we Brits have to put up with and I am sure there are worse countries out there.

Money does not "double every 7 years" (I presume you meant prices? RPI?). Either way that statement is wrong.

Super 8 film, index linked, is about the same cost it was 30 years ago when MUCH more was sold. We are lucky in that regard.

Where we are unlucky is the scarcity of outlets to buy the film. There are more labs now for 64T than there were for Kodachrome in the last 10 years, and realistically the situation isnt going to become like 1975 again.
The government says that by 2010 30% of us will be fat....I am merely a trendsetter :)
aj
Senior member
Posts: 3556
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:15 pm
Real name: Andre
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by aj »

Angus wrote:

Money does not "double every 7 years" (I presume you meant prices? RPI?). Either way that statement is wrong.
In general and in the long run invested money doubles itself every seven years. It is an economic experience.
Kind regards,

André
ekoe
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:16 pm
Real name: Edward Koehler
Location: London, UK

Post by ekoe »

Thanks for pointing that out, Ludwig.

It's disappointing to hear the discontinuation of HIE high speed infrared... a color reversal infrared stock! It's really psychedelic, but I guess nobody really used it?

Anyone know if there is another alternative color reversal infrared stock available. Kodak lists no replacement.
Post Reply