Hi,
I'm pretty new to Super 8 filming so I hope none of this is too obvious. I recently was luck enough to acquire a Canon 814 Auto Zoom (not the XL or Electronic versions) and a Nizo S480. I mainly want to do stop-frame abstract animation (i.e. liquid diffusion, paint, and light fx such as slit-scanning etc.), although I also do some outside filming as well. The general advice seems to be that you need to have a camera with 'macro' to do animation. Neither of my cameras has a macro function although both, the Canon in particular, seem to focus pretty well on small close-ups (i.e. I can clearly focus on a pc keyboard key from about an inch away). The Canon has 'microprism' but I understand that is not the same as 'macro'. Can anyone tell me how much more macro a macro camera can go, and what are the benefits of this for animation?
I guess I'm trying to find out whether I would be best selling on one, or both, cameras and getting something specifically for animation. Any help would be much appreciated.
Do I need a macro Super 8?
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 12:53 pm
- Real name: Steven Sutcliffe
- Contact:
- Charlie Blackfield
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:09 pm
- Real name: Klaus Huber
- Location: Bradford-on-Avon / UK
- Contact:
Re: Do I need a macro Super 8?
I would have thought that this is the macro setting you're using, although it may be called something different. Happy for anyone to correct me.(i.e. I can clearly focus on a pc keyboard key from about an inch away)
Personally I've got a Canon AutoZoom 814E that I've been using fairly regularly over the past seven years. Very robust motor, good for single frame shooting. I think the old AutoZoom 814 (without the ''E') is even sturdier. Strikes me as a very good choice for animation.
Charlie
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 12:53 pm
- Real name: Steven Sutcliffe
- Contact:
Re: Do I need a macro Super 8?
Thanks for the reply Charlie.
I've picked up a second hand Hoya close-up lens for the Canon which does the job very nicely, when I need to get really close-up. Going to experiment with both cameras and see which I get on with best.
Shooting with Super 8 is an expensive business but the results are worth it in my opinion. My plan is to 'rehearse' the animation sequences by taking photos on my Panasonic digital camera, and then try them out in Photoshop, before recording them with the Canon 814.
I've picked up a second hand Hoya close-up lens for the Canon which does the job very nicely, when I need to get really close-up. Going to experiment with both cameras and see which I get on with best.
Shooting with Super 8 is an expensive business but the results are worth it in my opinion. My plan is to 'rehearse' the animation sequences by taking photos on my Panasonic digital camera, and then try them out in Photoshop, before recording them with the Canon 814.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:40 pm
- Real name: John Almond
- Location: Wigan, England
- Contact:
Re: Do I need a macro Super 8?
in my limited experience of animation, as long as the camera is over 18 inches away from the subject then there is no need for macro.
- Charlie Blackfield
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:09 pm
- Real name: Klaus Huber
- Location: Bradford-on-Avon / UK
- Contact:
Re: Do I need a macro Super 8?
It depends on the camera. My Canon AutoZoom 814E wouldn't be able to focus on anything closer than 6 feet or thereabout, unless it's used in macro mode. There are, however, other Super 8 cameras that can do much better, especially late 1960s/early 1970s Bolex models.john59 wrote:in my limited experience of animation, as long as the camera is over 18 inches away from the subject then there is no need for macro.
Charlie