Has anybody shot straight 8 film? A Univex camera?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
cdg
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:56 am

Has anybody shot straight 8 film? A Univex camera?

Post by cdg »

OK, so I've been tracking some old Univex cameras on ebay, after reading a little about some of their old compact cameras (some of them are small even by today's standards!). However, it looks like Univex made their 8mm series to work with straight 8 film, which is apparantly half the width of double 8 film.

SO, my questions are as follows:

1) Are there any resources out there for straight 8 film? I can't seem to find much in the way of resources, besides vague descriptions.

2) Did straight 8 come in special cartridges? Anybody know if one could "reload" straight 8 in a dark bag by slitting it and rolling it onto a new spool of some kind?

3) Has anybody here shot straight 8 film?

4) Would there be any special developing concerns with straight 8, or would any old super8 lab be able to handle the downsized film? I thought that super 8 and regular 8 are the same width once developed, but I've never shot super 8 so I don't know about this...

Your response and thoughts on any of the above are appreciated. I am a camera collector by hobby, but I love to shoot the old cameras I buy. An old Univex C8 or similar would be an excellent addition to my collection I think...
User avatar
ultramarine
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 5:16 pm
Real name: George Patoulidis
Location: Greece

Post by ultramarine »

1. Online? Probably no! You should buy Juergen's book.
2. In most cass yes, just like the single 8 cartridges.
3. Me, no.
4. Kahl, is a source for straight 8 film, he also develops his stocks.
(5) You can easily find univex cameras on Ebay.com. They are not rare.
cdg
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:56 am

Post by cdg »

Yeah, they are definitely not rare. I usually try to find the best ones I can with original boxes and documentation though. I don't have the money to collect Bolex cameras, nor do I have a stash of Rolleiflexes. If I had that kind of money, I'd probably be shooting a lot more film. :lol:

I think that my niche in camera collecting is finding the better preserved common box type cameras. I also have a thing for turret cameras...
Matthew Buick
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:09 pm
Real name: Joe T Nondescript.
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Post by Matthew Buick »

Those Univex cameras look dreadful. I haope they made a better looking model. :?
Matthew Buick.
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Training to be a CBT Therapist. Deeply passionate about photography. Getting back into shooting Super 8.

My flickr profile: http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthewbuick/
camera8mm
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 6:01 am

Post by camera8mm »

I've shot 1x8mm with a ekran 1 which held the film in special cartridges. I used a slitter to cut down double 8mm film. a bit difficult to load in total darkness.
never used a unvex, even though i own 2. couldnt film the special reels the camera used. the lowest lens stop is 3.5 !
I did see some footage from one of the cameras as I found a univex projector with about 5 100' reels of farming footage and it looked good for b/w.
cdg
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:56 am

Post by cdg »

Hmmm, interesting. I wonder if there isn't some way to make something work for an old Univex. I'm very tempted to buy one now...

And yeah, I guess the cameras are a little ugly, but I think they're ugly in a "cute" sort of way, like VW bug or something. To each their own I suppose. :)

I guess slitting up the film sounds easier than it probably is.
User avatar
reflex
Senior member
Posts: 2131
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:25 am
Real name: James Grahame
Location: It's complicated
Contact:

Post by reflex »

cdg wrote:I guess slitting up the film sounds easier than it probably is.
Yup. You're playing with a sharp blade and a very long strip of plastic in complete darkness.

To be honest, it's probably much more trouble than it's worth. There are thousands of Regular 8 cameras available for practically nothing and the film is relatively easy to come by. The end result is the same in both cases.
www.retrothing.com
Vintage Gadgets & Technology
cdg
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:56 am

Post by cdg »

Sharp things in the darkroom? Cool! :) I just bought a Univex A8 on Ebay, so we'll have to see how this goes...

As for R8 cameras, I already have 2 that work quite well, and yes, R8 rocks.
StoneBuilder
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:29 pm
Real name: David Aspinall
Location: Newcastle, England
Contact:

Post by StoneBuilder »

There are two Single8 cameras on the UK ebaY site at the moment. I've no links for them, sadly, but they are both listed under 'cine cameras'.
David M. Leugers
Posts: 1632
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 12:42 am

Post by David M. Leugers »

About 30 years ago I was given a Univex Single-8 camera and a projector. The projector was just dreadful... I wouldn't run any kind of film through it let alone some of my home movies. I held onto the camera up until about 5 years ago. I had the notion when I first got it to actually shoot some film with it. ESO-S in Kansas City at the time would sell film for it if you provided the reels and you needed at least two to put film on (plus one for a take-up). I had three reels, but they were of such dubious construction - cheap flimsy stamped metal- that I couldn't see how they could do a good job of keeping light off the film while loading and unloading. Also you only get 25-33ft of film on the reel. All in all, R-8mm was far more practical and the equipment so much better. Still, it was the smallest and lightest 8mm camera I have ever seen. It was pretty cool looking in black crinkle paint and art deco styling.


David M. Leugers
camera8mm
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 6:01 am

Post by camera8mm »

the bolsey 8mm uses 1x8mm film. not sure what that crowd does for film loading. I have a bell howell which takes 1x8mm film but have yet to shoot with it.
cdg
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:56 am

Post by cdg »

Univex had a history of building pretty cheap products. They built their cameras cheaply because they often used their own film standards, and wanted to be able to stand a chance against the already established Kodak Eastman company. We'll see how this one comes through. If I ever use it at all, which is doubtful, it is limited to an F5.6 lens! Even with 100 ASA film, it's going to be a daylight only kind of deal.
Post Reply