Timelapse and motion?

Collaborative film projects
Post Reply

What do you want?

Only timelapse/stop motion
3
18%
Both timelapse/stop motion and normal motion/slowmo film
14
82%
 
Total votes: 17

User avatar
Andreas Wideroe
Site Admin
Posts: 2273
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 4:50 pm
Real name: Andreas Wideroe
Location: Kristiansand, Norway
Contact:

Timelapse and motion?

Post by Andreas Wideroe »

Seems like some of you want to be able to use both timelapse/stop motion and normal motion/slow mo film. Here's a poll to determine this.
Andreas Wideroe
Filmshooting | Com - Administrator

Please help support the Filmshooting forum with donations
User avatar
vidwerk
Posts: 822
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 2:20 am
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Contact:

Post by vidwerk »

I have voted for the time-lapse as well as various frame rates for versatility reasons.
Cheers, Simon.
sammm
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 8:33 am

Post by sammm »

Both is a better idea for watching and for film maker participation.
Daniel
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 12:17 am
Location: Chile

Vote

Post by Daniel »

Hello,

I vote for :
Both Timelapse/stop motion and normal motion/slowmo film

But I hope normal motion/slowmo film to be used in a small quantity in the final final in order to preserve this as a Time Lapse project.

However I consider good to get some normal motion/slowmo film for transitions purposes for example.

Regards
Daniel
Petteri
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 2:15 pm
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Contact:

Both..

Post by Petteri »

I will personally take only time-lapse, but it's not bad idea to have some "normal" footage in the final film either.

Petteri
drsanchez
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 6:34 pm
Location: Reno, NV

Post by drsanchez »

one vote for combination of time-lapse and normal/slow motion. And, when you think about it, isn't all motion picture shot in time lapse, just with varying degrees of lapsing?
dr.sanchez, son of a midwestern bureaucrat
Patrick

Post by Patrick »

I vote for the majority of the film to be time lapse intercut with at least some normal motion/slow motion segments. Personally, I think that this will be most effective. Overall though, I still consider this to be a time lapse project.

When I am out filming, it will be mostly time lapse that I will be focussing on.
utilityskate
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 8:27 am
Location: Hong Kong

My vote

Post by utilityskate »

I've voted for both Normal / Slow motion in addition to timelapse. As Attenka and Vidwerk stated, this is perfect to add contrast to the timelapse and will add variety to the project.
ed
Post Reply