by Patrick » Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:04 am
"...the only reason why I want to use a digital camera too is because it's higher quality, and just in case the super 8 film gets messed up."
I wouldn't necessarily agree with digital video being higher quality than super 8. Video may appear 'crisper' and cleaner. On the other hand, film (whether that be super 8 or 16mm or whatever) has a greater degree of colour saturation that video - though that depends on the particular film stock used. If you filmed a sunset on Kodachrome for example, the colours would literally jump off the screen.
Additionally, film has greater exposure latitude then video - this of course depends on the type of film stock used as well - and if you are using negative or reversal film. Negative film has greater exposure latitude than reversal. Though smaller film sizes like super 8 do not seem to handle contrast as well as larger film sizes. Still, I have seen examples of super 8 reversal handling contrasty situations more efficiently than many video cameras would.
Though I agree with the part of your quote that seems to suggest that video can be more convient than film - ie used for instant playback and providing back up footage just in case the film footage gets incorrectly exposed or the focus is off.
Last edited by
Patrick on Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:50 am, edited 1 time in total.