Loading 100 ft Camera spools (16mm) myself

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
mrmatta
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:55 am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Loading 100 ft Camera spools (16mm) myself

Post by mrmatta »

I have a few thousand feet of 16mm color neg stock on 400ft rolls. I would love to spool some of it onto 100ft rolls to use in my Filmo 70HR.

Is there any reason why I couldn't/shouldn't do this myself??? I have spare 100ft camera spools with boxes and a set of 16mm rewinds. My guess is that I could spool the 400ft onto an empty 400ft roll in a dark room and then rewind the film onto 100ft rolls.

Seems simple. Am I missing something obvious??

Thanks for any help.
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

it's that simple. watch out for static discharges though, and make sure you don't wind the film on one side of the spool only. it needs to be wound from side to side to allow daylight loading. oh, and a split reel for the core load would also be a good idea.

/matt
User avatar
Nigel
Senior member
Posts: 2775
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2002 10:14 am
Real name: Adam
Location: Lost
Contact:

Post by Nigel »

The keycodes will be backwards if you just spool it on.

You should go:

--------------->
<--------------

Good Luck
User avatar
audadvnc
Senior member
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by audadvnc »

Instead of respooling to 100' loads you could save yourself the trouble and get a 400' magazine for your Filmo. You can buy them on eBay for about $30.
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

Nigel wrote:The keycodes will be backwards if you just spool it on.
yes, but since it's neg stock and thus single perf you can't do that anyway.

/matt
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

audadvnc wrote:Instead of respooling to 100' loads you could save yourself the trouble and get a 400' magazine for your Filmo.
or you can spool onto smaller loads and save yourself the trouble of lugging around a huge camera. :-)

/matt
User avatar
Nigel
Senior member
Posts: 2775
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2002 10:14 am
Real name: Adam
Location: Lost
Contact:

Post by Nigel »

Pardon me Mattias but I see no mention of Singel-Perf in his statement.

Good Luck
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

me neither, but is there double perf negative other than as a special order? i thought even the black and white negative stocks had been discontinued as double perf. it doesn't matter either way though since what *is* mentioned is that he's already planning on tranferring to an empty core and rewinding onto the spools. :-)

/matt
User avatar
Nigel
Senior member
Posts: 2775
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2002 10:14 am
Real name: Adam
Location: Lost
Contact:

Post by Nigel »

Just in case you are shooting in the USA anytime soon. Kodak does still supply Double Perf film--practically every stock is made in 1R & 2R. Fuji on the other hand supplies 2R by special request.

Good Luck
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

thanks. i didn't know.

/matt
mrmatta
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:55 am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Post by mrmatta »

Thanks for all of the help. My plan was already to spool onto another 440ft roll and then rewind onto 100ft roll, hence:

-------------->
<------------

Glad to confirm that this will work and keycodes should remain correct.

As far as the 400ft. mag for my Filmo, I have one but I am of the understanding that I need the electronic motor to pull that much film through the camera. The motor seems very rare. I've seen several in auctions with a complete Filmo package but I don't need a whole package, kinda defeats the purpose of having a cheap camera.

Again, thanks to all.
Post Reply