K40 at night?
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
K40 at night?
I'm going to be shooting my first film this summer. I was debating for a while whether to shoot on super 8 or 16mm. i figured if i shot on k40 it would be cheaper. buy it from kodak, process it though walmart. and i can also check out the film before spending money to get it transfered. by the way i also just bought a canon 514xls. seemed like a good buy after seeing numerous people from here and other places recommending the camera. anyway, i was just wondering how k40 is at night, or in low lighting conditions. I had heard some people get good results. so i was wondering, should i shoot low lighting/night scenes on k40, or another stock?
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:08 am
- Contact:
I'm still convinced it can be done. Though I haven't seen good results- yet!
I think Kodachrome only has an exposure latitude of about 3 or 4, so whatever is most important in your frame - light it very well then prepare for the rest of your shoot to sink into darkness.
I like the feel of kodachrome at night though, it's kinda cool.
I'd shoot at 18fps though instead of 24 for the longer exposure - the canon only does 9 and 18 anyways aint that right?
I think Kodachrome only has an exposure latitude of about 3 or 4, so whatever is most important in your frame - light it very well then prepare for the rest of your shoot to sink into darkness.
I like the feel of kodachrome at night though, it's kinda cool.
I'd shoot at 18fps though instead of 24 for the longer exposure - the canon only does 9 and 18 anyways aint that right?
- thebrowniecameraguy
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 9:21 pm
- Real name: Jordan Stewart
- Location: Sherman, Texas
- Contact:
This is a kinda night filming question.
Can you push K40 2 stops to film in normal light conditions with medocre 200 watt floods for a scene and then expect it to turn out?
Or do I have the push pull idea back ass wards?
Cheers,
Jordan
Can you push K40 2 stops to film in normal light conditions with medocre 200 watt floods for a scene and then expect it to turn out?
Or do I have the push pull idea back ass wards?
Cheers,
Jordan
I'm back, I'm back- thebrowniecameraguy is back! I still have my Brownie 8mm Turret f/1.9! Time to play!
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:06 pm
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Contact:
RE
City lights at night look great on K40 with an XL lens.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:06 pm
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Contact:
RE
City lights at night look great on K40 with an XL lens.
-
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 11:23 am
- Location: Midlands,UK
- Contact:
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:46 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
- Contact:
This is my feeling also. You need to really get some heavy lighting involved. I wouldn't bother with VNF either, I find it to be only marginally faster, and with a colour saturation that does not cut well with K40. If you use VNF for one scene you need to use it for the whole movie (unless you want to create some sort of effect)mattias wrote:without bringing in extra lights? no, it can't be done. what other people in this thread are talking about is whether you'll see the lights in the frame themselves, which you will, but the light they cast will never ever give you any detail in anything else.
/matt
If you need a night scene, I would strongly suggest shooting day for night. I had sucess with K40 in full sun and closing the aperture down - I cant remember haow many stops, mabey 3. While this is crude, I think you will have more sucess than trying to do it actually at night.
Matt
Birmingham UK.
http://www.wells-photography.co.uk
Avatar: Kenneth Moore (left) with producers (centre) discussing forthcoming film to be financed by my grandfather (right) C.1962
http://www.wells-photography.co.uk
Avatar: Kenneth Moore (left) with producers (centre) discussing forthcoming film to be financed by my grandfather (right) C.1962
Even with an f1.2 lens and 220 degree shutter you're pushing K40's well known abilities in an underexposure situation to the absolute limits if you expect anything at night without extra lighting.
If you want to film under streetlamps you'll need VNF Ektachrome or even tri-x.
However, I have had excellent results on K40 at floodlit events, such as a medieval jousting tournament where the only light was from floodlights.
As an example to get proper exposure on my still camera at f3.5 I needed 1600 ASA film, or 800 and a flash.....but using f1.4 and 220 degree shutter on super 8 I managed to get wonderful results on K40.
If you want to film under streetlamps you'll need VNF Ektachrome or even tri-x.
However, I have had excellent results on K40 at floodlit events, such as a medieval jousting tournament where the only light was from floodlights.
As an example to get proper exposure on my still camera at f3.5 I needed 1600 ASA film, or 800 and a flash.....but using f1.4 and 220 degree shutter on super 8 I managed to get wonderful results on K40.
Yes, you don't neccesarily need *extra* lights but if you don't then the lights that are already there had better be damned good!Angus wrote:However, I have had excellent results on K40 at floodlit events, such as a medieval jousting tournament where the only light was from floodlights.

What I was filming was covered in 500 watt worklamps and it came out amazingly beautiful!
K40 at night is lovely when it works but you are limited to certain kinds of subject matter without bringing extra lighting!

love
Freya