Cleaning 16mm Prints

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Cleaning 16mm Prints

Post by Will2 »

I have a bunch of old 16mm prints (Casablanca, Philadelphia Story, Arsenic and Old Lace, ect.) Mostly B&W that I want to do some maintenance on. Like fix any old spices and clean the film in general.

My local lab has a film cleaning system that they run their negatives through after processing. The tech says he's done it with print stocks for some amazing results.

My question is if it is safe for this old b&w print stock to be cleaned by one of these machines? It's the standard film cleaning machines that labs use...don't know all the details on how it works other than a few rollers that lift dirt and a liquid that is used to clean it.

Any ideas?
woods01
Posts: 822
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 3:09 am
Location: Vancouver
Contact:

Re: Cleaning 16mm Prints

Post by woods01 »

Yes, the negative is more prone to scratching/damage than your prints are. Plus chances are your prints have seen decades of dust, scratches and bad splices, they won't look any worse! If you're going to do this, then fix all your old splices. Check with the lab if tape or cement splices are okay with their system. However there are several DIY cleaning products on the market that you might find is a lot cheaper than using a lab.
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: Cleaning 16mm Prints

Post by Will2 »

Just got them back and I can already see a big difference. They replaced most of the bad tape splices with glue slices (made me get a hot splicer after seeing how good they are) and put it through the cleaning machine.
slashmaster
Posts: 657
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:07 am
Real name: slashmaster
Contact:

Re: Cleaning 16mm Prints

Post by slashmaster »

woods01 wrote:Yes, the negative is more prone to scratching/damage than your prints are. Plus chances are your prints have seen decades of dust, scratches and bad splices, they won't look any worse! If you're going to do this, then fix all your old splices. Check with the lab if tape or cement splices are okay with their system. However there are several DIY cleaning products on the market that you might find is a lot cheaper than using a lab.
What? Negatives are more prone to scratches? Why would this be?
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: Cleaning 16mm Prints

Post by Will2 »

I think dust, dirt and scratches just show up more in negatives when printing or transferring. It's probably easier for prints to get scratches because they are used so much more. Projectors are mean machines and most negatives are handled like they precious gold.
Post Reply