35mm...the new 16?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

35mm...the new 16?

Post by Will2 »

Has anyone else noticed all the 35mm cameras being dumped on eBay recently? It has me wondering if 35mm filmmaking is becoming slightly more affordable.
  • Arri 2Bs and 2Cs which are really amazing cameras when maintained well are going for $3000 and less.
  • Camera are staying on rental house shelves so deals can be made there even if they aren't lowering the published rates
  • Buying shortends, recans, ect. in 35mm is easier than 16mm. I just bought 3600ft of Fuji 64D for $180. My lab tested it and it's fine.
  • Telecine on Rank/Spirit/ect. costs the same on 35 as 16mm and is coming down fast in price
  • Processing is of course twice as expensive since the film is twice as long for the same runtime
  • The cameras are of course not very practical to take on vacation except possibly for an Eyemo.
  • The quality difference is amazing, especially in the background detail; plus shooting with that huge viewfinder is great too
Just some thoughts.
grainy
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:51 pm
Real name: Erik Hammen
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by grainy »

Will2 wrote:[*]Buying shortends, recans, ect. in 35mm is easier than 16mm. I just bought 3600ft of Fuji 64D for $180. My lab tested it and it's fine.

Just some thoughts.
I've been getting that feeling. Also you see Kinor 35 cameras on ebay for what K3s used to go for back in their (long gone, apparently) heyday.
User avatar
BAC
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:27 pm
Real name: Bryan Chernick
Location: Bothell, WA
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by BAC »

The projectors are huge 8O . It would take up half my living room. I'll stick with 8mm.
User avatar
beamascope
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:47 pm
Real name: Jim Gibbons
Location: Oklahoma City, OK.
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by beamascope »

I'll admit $180 for 3600 feet of any film format is a sweet deal. :D
carllooper
Senior member
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
Real name: Carl Looper
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by carllooper »

Will2 wrote: [*]Processing is of course twice as expensive since the film is twice as long for the same runtime
While twice as long it's also twice as wide so should cost four times the price.

I might pick up up one for doing digital to film transfers. Shoot Super8 > digital intermediate > 35mm film > box under my bed.

Carl
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
User avatar
avortex
Posts: 413
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Valentian Country (Europe)
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by avortex »

If you shoot 2-perf (AKA techniscope), you have 50% less in film, processing and telecine, so you can end up with less expense than 16mm.
Exciting times... 8)
Marc
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by S8 Booster »

+ if film production was limited to only 1 standard 35mm the price could technically go down......


shoot....
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
carllooper
Senior member
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
Real name: Carl Looper
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by carllooper »

We'll need to change the name of this forum to "large gauge film forum".
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
User avatar
LeoStehlik
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:01 pm
Real name: Leo Stehlik
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by LeoStehlik »

carllooper wrote:We'll need to change the name of this forum to "large gauge film forum".
well... wasn't 70mm gauge the "real" large gauge film? :D compared to that, 35mm is still a small-ish format
User avatar
Mana
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 9:27 am
Real name: Todd Pinder
Location: Honolulu
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by Mana »

Well not just 35mm, I just got a Factory converted Bolex EBM Super 16 package including a zoom and original box for less than $700 shipped! And this camera is clean!
R8: Bolex B8

S8: Beaulieu 7008 Pro, Beaulieu 4008zm2 "Jubilee", Leicina Special, Eumig Nautica (24fps)

DS8: Bolex H8 Rex4

S16: Bolex Rex4
richard p. t.
Senior member
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by richard p. t. »

I too have started taking advantage of 35mm. I have a Konvas 1M which I have been shooting with. Of course, for myself, I can do my own processing. I also have a 35mm projector which is great. I shot 1000' by single frame hand cranking on a trip to Tasmania last month. Was very heavy carrying the Konvas as well as 100' cans of film in the bush.
Takes up a lot of room in the drying racks too when I process it.
I run Nano Lab - Australia's super8 ektachrome processing service
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
User avatar
avortex
Posts: 413
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Valentian Country (Europe)
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by avortex »

Wow! Travelling with a Konvas! You're a brave man, Richard...

I've recently purchased a Cameflex CM3 modified for Techniscope, and can't wait to start shooting with it. Shooting 35mm at cheap prices: a dream come true! Now it's time to make movies... :wink:
Marc
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by Will2 »

I just rebuilt a battery for a pristine Arri 2C. Can't wait to try it out.

That viewfinder has such a bright, large image and it is much easier to focus than 16mm.
carllooper
Senior member
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
Real name: Carl Looper
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by carllooper »

richard p. t. wrote:I too have started taking advantage of 35mm. I have a Konvas 1M which I have been shooting with. Of course, for myself, I can do my own processing. I also have a 35mm projector which is great. I shot 1000' by single frame hand cranking on a trip to Tasmania last month. Was very heavy carrying the Konvas as well as 100' cans of film in the bush.
Takes up a lot of room in the drying racks too when I process it.
Hey Richard - let me know when you're having a screening - would love to see what you've done. And I can fill you in on my progress with the DIY datacine about which we were speaking some time ago. And otherwise talk film and philosophy.
Carl
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: 35mm...the new 16?

Post by Will2 »

well... wasn't 70mm gauge the "real" large gauge film? :D compared to that, 35mm is still a small-ish format
Just held a strip of 70mm and a 65mm film at my local rental house...can't imagine how amazing those images must look if they are scanned at 8k; not that anything can actually display it at 8k other than a print.

If you want to see what film can do check out this movie on Blu-Ray.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103767/
Post Reply