From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
User avatar
gianni1
Senior member
Posts: 1011
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 10:30 am
Location: Bag End, Hobbiton
Contact:

From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by gianni1 »

To me there seems to be some sort of collective online amnesia regarding apron processing. Anyone have seen a library book about it? Why is it like "the one who's name we must not mention"? It reminds me of the ancient greek gods, who were defeated and dethroned by the "one" god / goddess.... if you are into that sort of thing...

Here is a Leaflet I've found with cine film developing instructions. It came with my apron cine film tank, and indicates it's not specific to my tank. It mentions "the vessel you propose to use as a tank". Does that mean any type of tank? It contains a apron made from a strip of 16mm film.

Image

Image

G 8)
User avatar
beamascope
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:47 pm
Real name: Jim Gibbons
Location: Oklahoma City, OK.
Contact:

Re: From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by beamascope »

So when they say BLEACH do they mean simple bleach? Like the stuff for use in laundry?
nickrapak
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:51 am
Real name: Nicholas Rapak
Contact:

Re: From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by nickrapak »

beamascope wrote:So when they say BLEACH do they mean simple bleach? Like the stuff for use in laundry?
No. Chlorine bleach will ruin the film. The recipe for the bleach is on the left side of the page, about halfway down under "Mixing the Chemicals"
User avatar
beamascope
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:47 pm
Real name: Jim Gibbons
Location: Oklahoma City, OK.
Contact:

Re: From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by beamascope »

Thanks. I didn't even see that.
User avatar
gianni1
Senior member
Posts: 1011
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 10:30 am
Location: Bag End, Hobbiton
Contact:

Re: From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by gianni1 »

For a few more detailed pix of the tanks internals:

Image


G 8)
User avatar
Clapton Pond
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:18 pm
Real name: Ian Williams
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by Clapton Pond »

Nice idea, but I'm a bit vague on what an "apron" actually is in this context. Can you enlighten me?

ian
https://www.slaughterback.com
https://www.youtube.com/user/slaughterbackfilms
https://www.gamine.net
http://www.youtube.com/user/gaminefilms
User avatar
wahiba
Posts: 948
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 9:24 am
Real name: David
Location: Keighley, UK
Contact:

Re: From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by wahiba »

I think it means that film in the spiral is like an 'apron' as opposed to continuous processes. Not a term I have heard before.

65 minutes is possible. If you settled for a negative only then it could be much quicker.

Slowest bit is loading the tank. quite tricky in a large changing bag on the kitchen table. (been there so I know)
New web site and this is cine page http://www.picsntech.co.uk/cine.html
User avatar
gianni1
Senior member
Posts: 1011
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 10:30 am
Location: Bag End, Hobbiton
Contact:

Re: From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by gianni1 »

Here is a link I found to a modern instructional video clip on youtube about loading a short roll of still film into an apron processor.

Another search result explains a bit of the history of apron processing technique

from the 'focal' Photo Guide No.46 (1956) by Percy W Harris ... writes:
'Apron' Spiral Loading Tanks
The first tank had a circular moulded plastic body with a light-tight lid. Inside was a plastic bobbin (reel) with plain end faces, between which could be wound a length of celluloid (called an 'apron'), the same width as the film. This apron had little projections on its edges so that when the photographic film was wound within it, the film was touched only by the projections.

As they touched only the perforated part of the film and not the picture itself, the developer had access to all the picture area. Once the loaded reel had been placed inside the light-tight tank in the darkroom, the whole thing could be brought out into normal lighting. The necessary chemicals were then poured in and out without exposing the film to light. This soon became the standard way to develop 35mm films."
Looks really easy with short rolls of one or two meters, but I have my doubts about 10 or 33 meters of cine film!

I bought a Kodacraft tank with aprons and instructions on ebay. I'll upload pix of the brief instructions soon. Problem is the aprons stink (along with the contents of the box) so bad I wanna puke, not process film or take photos of the stinking leaflet!

G 8)
User avatar
Clapton Pond
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:18 pm
Real name: Ian Williams
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: From Camera to Screen in 65 Minutes

Post by Clapton Pond »

Thanks Gianni - is it easier than loading a spiral then?
ian
https://www.slaughterback.com
https://www.youtube.com/user/slaughterbackfilms
https://www.gamine.net
http://www.youtube.com/user/gaminefilms
Post Reply