The following is the beginning of a script for a film I'll be making in due course - but the script begins in Film Theory (and ends there for the time being) ...
http://members.iinet.net.au/~carllooper ... Theory.pdf
Film Theory
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
- Real name: Carl Looper
- Contact:
Film Theory
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:44 pm
- Location: victoria, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Film Theory
Hi there Carl,
I read your pdf just now. I am going to send you a pm.
cheers,
richard
I read your pdf just now. I am going to send you a pm.
cheers,
richard
I run Nano Lab - Australia's super8 ektachrome processing service
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
Re: Film Theory
I suppose Bazin could consider Red Balloon to be realist partly because it is very weak theater. Albeit lyrical it has a little bit more of what Bresson would have called “cinematography†than it has theater.
Wade
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
- Real name: Carl Looper
- Contact:
Re: Film Theory
Bazin's argument is that the deception (or trick) owes nothing to photography. As a TV magician might say: "What you are about to see is not a camera trick".Wade wrote:I suppose Bazin could consider Red Balloon to be realist partly because it is very weak theater. Albeit lyrical it has a little bit more of what Bresson would have called “cinematography†than it has theater.
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/