I had heard about using coffee, tea, Coca Cola, Vitamin C as photo developers some time back and put experimentation on my "rainy day, just shy of never" project list. The rainy day came recently and after a couple of false starts I finally got results.
With common household chemicals: (strong) coffee, Vitamin C tablets, baking soda, lye and 20 Mule Team Borax, I was able to get a usable negative image from Plus-X 7276. Of course D76 is cheaper, faster and better in all ways, but - what the heck, it's kind of fun to recreate Talbot and Herschel in your kitchen sink.

Shown are 2 strips of 7276, one developed in D76, the other in Caffenol. Guess which is which?

An example frame of film developed in D76, and -

So what, you say? Why bother with an inefficient and error prone technique when a faster and easier method exists? Just because, I suppose - 'cause it's there.
For more information, try:
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/text-coffee.html
http://shutterbug.com/techniques/film_p ... sb_coffee/