New Super 8 cartridge - and Ektachrome 100D from Kodak?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Jim Carlile
Posts: 927
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 9:59 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by Jim Carlile »

MIKI-814 wrote: I'm lost... in a Canon 814AZ-E, what should I do to shoot correctly a Plux-x? and Tri-x? Cancel the filter or not? And what about in a Canon 310XL?
Oh wow-- there's about a dozen threads on this, some pretty arcane and complicated.

They're interesting, though, because none of this was figured out until the last few years or so. The earlier magazines at the time all got it wrong-- mostly because there was only one daylight color stock available and the problem never came up with that one ('G' film) because no one used it much seriously.

In a nutshell--

1) If your camera is a SMPTE compatible one (the 814 probably is), then you can run the new Plus-X correctly, and possibly Tri-X, but in most SMPTE cameras Tri-X will be overexposed a bit. That's because-- keeping it simple-- they're both "daylight" cartridges, meaning they are notchless and they push in the filter pin. The filter's already cancelled. They rate both films at 100 ASA-- good for Plus-X, not so good for Tri-X.

I have a feeling the 814 will read Tri-X correctly though, because it can read higher speed notches (?) If the 814 can read 250, it will read Tri-X at 160, which is OK.)

2) If your camera is not a SMPTE, you can run Tri-X correctly, but Plus-X will be underexposed a bit. These cameras will rate both films at 160, because that's what they are notched for (to be precise, Tri-X is notched for 250, but most cameras will only go as high as 160.) Either way, you can't control the filter-- it's automatically out, always.

The reason for all of this complication? Blame it on Ektachrome 'G' film. On later non-SMPTE cameras, pushing in the filter pin cancels the 85 filter as well as the correction that was factored in to compensate for the filter. That allowed daylight 'G' film to be rated at 160 ASA.

With SMPTE cameras, the filter is cancelled, but the "correction" remains, so to speak. This enables the camera to effectively meter film at a lower "daylight" ASA. That's what's happening, effectively, when the filter is in place. Only with the SMPTE camera you can do it with the filter out, which is what you need to do for "daylight" non-tungsten film.

But these cameras wouldn't run 'G' film correctly, because Kodak insisted that this film be notchless, so that you couldn't use the 85 filter, even though it would work with that stock. They didn't give you the option, so most SMPTE cameras wouldn't run it correctly. They ran it at 100 ASA. Thus the rise of simpler, non-SMPTE "xl" cameras that could use 'G' film.

The 310 is a whole different world in itself. That's the subject of about two dozen threads! But the 814 should be able to read both B/W stocks correctly. Many other cameras will not-- it's one or the other but not both.
User avatar
MIKI-814
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:53 pm
Real name: Miguel
Location: BILBAO, Basque Country, EU
Contact:

Post by MIKI-814 »

Thank you! It's all clear to me now :wink:
Muckymuck
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:01 am
Contact:

Post by Muckymuck »

100D is still compatible with far more cameras than 64T.

The type G cameras tend to be the very latest type (late 70s-early 80s) whereas cameras which accept 64T tend to be the very earliest or just the high-end models. Those in-between (70s cameras mostly) take 40 and 160 artificial light films but also 25 and 100 daylight films.

Whether or not we're talking about auto exposure, I think it has been shown time and time again that 100D is preferred by most people because

- It has finer grain than 64T
- It is sharper than 64T
- Most Super 8 is shot outdoors
- Those shooting indoors would tend to use 200T or 500T negative anyway.

The Canon 310XL is an exception for the later cameras, it does not do type G, it does 25, 100, 160 daylight and 40, 160, 250 tungsten.
T-Scan
Senior member
Posts: 2331
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 9:19 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by T-Scan »

Alsmost every experience i see or read about 64T has been mishandled in one way or another. Either shot without filter, internal filter and no 85B, or overexposed by 40/160 cameras. Basically, there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of people shooting it at the right exposure with the internal disabled and external 85B filter. Needless to say, it takes "some" effort to get it right... however, 100D still looks much better and seems to be more idiot proof. Exposure will meter propperly and no filter needed. The only drawback would be it's speed in bright sunlight, where a ND .6 would be a one time purchase solution (good for all the other fast stocks too) making it a 25ASA daylight film. TTL meters will just compensate for it. The 100ASA comes in handy in so many insatnces. Having that advantage is good, because you can always take speed away, but you can't add it.
100D and Vision 3 please
User avatar
etimh
Senior member
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by etimh »

Blue Audio Visual wrote:Many Super 8 users are possessed by a disturbingly evangelical fervour for the format.
Well, I don't know anything about how good or bad this stuff is for "Juergen's magazine," but this comment is hilarious. And brilliant. :D

Tim
User avatar
Blue Audio Visual
Posts: 794
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 7:40 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Blue Audio Visual »

Juergen wrote: Really good copy for my magazine? Only good film stock brings filmers and readers...
Sorry Juergen, I wasn't trying to imply that you were deliberately leading your readers down the garden path, although on reflection I appreciate that my post does seem to read that way. Mea maxima culpa. I was railing against the way in which some otherwise perfectly sensible people appear to lose their grip on reality when discussing the Holy Grail of Ektachrome 100D.

Tim, they say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, so I'm glad to see that you've adopted my phrase as your signature for the while. However, don't you spell 'fervour' as 'fervor' over there in the US?
User avatar
Blue Audio Visual
Posts: 794
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 7:40 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Blue Audio Visual »

Juergen wrote:Just for clarification: Wittner asked Kodak if they could produce 100D - and under which premises. The answer was that they would think about it when there is at least one company giving an order for about US $ 50,000. Wittner placed this order. There is no answer from Kodak up to now.
Juergen said this in the thread about 64T being unavailable in Europe, these 2 threads seem to be getting a bit confused, so I've posted it here as it seems to be more relevant.

What I would like to know is who is actually in a position at Kodak to OK the decision? Presumably it would not go through without the approval of Mary Jane Hellyar, who has been President of Entertainment Imaging since January 8th 2007? Juergen, do you have any indication as to exactly who Wittner has been talking to? My point is, I guess, that Hellyar is clearly the Organ Grinder in this particular instance. If Wittner have only been in contact with Kodak in Germany then I would not give any credence to the "Fairytale of 100D". Can you shed any further light on this?

Bart
User avatar
natxo
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: Somewhere in the Basque Country
Contact:

super8 is not high priority for kodak

Post by natxo »

I know someone has told it in previous posts, buy I think the real fact in this story is that s8 is not a priority for kodak. And it´s understandable for an enterprise point of view. S8 and film fans priorities are not kodak company´s priorities. Major market is video and digital imaging market; there are not new 8mm cameras in stock, and all of us are continuosly healing our precious cams to make it work.

Then, if I were a Kodak manager, I would think: my survellaince lies on 2 markets: a) continuously growing consumer digital imaging; and b)professional cinematography and photography. Outside of them, I maintain another type of collateral production, to cover the small sectors - like us.

Kodak knows that they cover the super8 sector with b/w film, negative for professionals and fans, and I suppose they added 64T because they needed maintain at least one colour reversal stock, and it was easy for them to produce without additional investments. Outside of this direct production, they sell a lot of raw stock to entrepreneurs like Wittner, Pro8...and this stock arrives to the end market with two consequences: us the final users are happy, and us the final users maintain our fidelity to Kodak -a least I trust in them and will follow.

Their point of view, I think, is that super8 market is good covered with their direct and indirect supplies, and they will support it with a good service and attention, but without taking any risk. So I bet it will not be any new super8 stock directly from Kodak in the future.
User avatar
Juergen
Posts: 680
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:56 am
Contact:

Post by Juergen »

Just for clarification: Wittner asked Kodak USA if they could produce 100D - and under which premises. The answer was that they would think about it when there is at least one company giving an order for about US $ 50,000. Wittner placed this order. There is no answer from Kodak up to now.

100D would NOT be a replacement for 64T. This product will be on the market anyway.
http://www.atollmedien.de
the books about all cameras and projectors ever built
mr8mm
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 7:18 pm
Real name: john schwind
Location: California
Contact:

Post by mr8mm »

Kodak has answered Mr. Wittner's question. The answer is no 100D in S8. Kodak will continue to offered 100D in DS8 and monitor the sales of the DS8 product.

John S.
ccortez
Senior member
Posts: 2220
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:07 am
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Post by ccortez »

mr8mm wrote:Kodak has answered Mr. Wittner's question. The answer is no 100D in S8. Kodak will continue to offered 100D in DS8 and monitor the sales of the DS8 product.

John S.
Major bummer, John. Are you currently stocking 100D in R8?
Jim Carlile
Posts: 927
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 9:59 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by Jim Carlile »

Muckymuck wrote:100D is still compatible with far more cameras than 64T.

The type G cameras tend to be the very latest type (late 70s-early 80s) whereas cameras which accept 64T tend to be the very earliest or just the high-end models. Those in-between (70s cameras mostly) take 40 and 160 artificial light films but also 25 and 100 daylight films.
Not to quibble, but I suspect that "type G' cameras far outsold the others and were still working, and that's why Kodak figured 64T was more "compatible." They will run 100D at 160, not too good. The thinking is obviously that overexposure is better than under.
Whether or not we're talking about auto exposure, I think it has been shown time and time again that 100D is preferred by most people because

- It has finer grain than 64T
- It is sharper than 64T
- Most Super 8 is shot outdoors
- Those shooting indoors would tend to use 200T or 500T negative anyway.
Agreed.
The Canon 310XL is an exception for the later cameras, it does not do type G, it does 25, 100, 160 daylight and 40, 160, 250 tungsten.
I think Ektachrome 'G' film was notched for 250 ASA. If that was the case, then the 310 will run 'G' film correctly at 160 if it's SMPTE compatible (I think it is.) Since the whole idea of the 310 was super-low light, I'd be really surprised if it didn't run 'G' film.

It's all academic anyway, because G film is long gone, but it explains why and how it does work. It's the same reason why Tri-X is notched for 250 even though it's 200-- it's so that SMPTE compatible cameras will run it at a lower effective ASA of 160, because that's how they work with the notchless daylight cartridges. There's no 200 ASA speed notch.

With the filter pin pushed in, they keep the + 2/3 stop "correction," thus opening up the aperture a little, all the time, to compensate for the slightly lower film speed of the film itself. They read it at 250, open up the iris a bit like they always do with the pin in and the filter out, and there you go. All very clever and economical...

That's why the Canon 310 will read 'G' film. Same as Tri-X. The thinking again was obviously that a little overexposure on Tri-X (reading 200 as 160) was better than a little underexposure, as well as that most cameras wouldn't read anything above 160.

The real question is: why does Kodak insist on Tri-X having a notchless cartridge? With 'G' film, the idea was that they never wanted the 85 filter in, because even though it would work, it would defeat the purpose of the high speed color film (the notchless cartridge also meant that you had to get a new non-SMPTE camera in order to run it! Reason being? Most SMPTE cameras then wouldn't read the 250 speed notch. They saw it as 160, and metered the notchless cartridge at 100.)

But if Tri-X had a filter notch, it would rate at least at 160 on every camera ever made (that reads that high.) You could also throw in the 85 filter as an ND in bright light situations. So why is it notchless? Just so that really advanced cameras wouldn't rate it at the 250 ASA speed notch and underexpose it a bit? Why didn't they just notch it at 160 and be done with it all? That's how it ends up.

Doesn't make much sense--it just complicates things.
Muckymuck
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:01 am
Contact:

Post by Muckymuck »

It's actually very easy to re-notch a cartridge with a stanley knife. Try it! (but be careful not to injure yourself! :wink:
Jim Carlile
Posts: 927
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 9:59 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by Jim Carlile »

Right, same with Plus-X. That can solve the problem with 'g' cameras.

I was thinking, it occurred to me that if the Canon 310 can read 250 ASA, then it will run daylight notchless Tri-X or 'G' film no matter what kind of camera it is. It'll run it at 250 if it's non-SMPTE, a little underexposed.

As to why they don't notch Tri-X on their own, and speed notch it at 160 from the beginning, I suspect it's the same idea-- that a little guaranteed overexposure on all cameras is better than the alternative of losing almost a full stop with an 85 on what's supposed to be high-speed film. Also, some people might bitch that it was speed-notched lower than it was advertised. And if they kept the speed notch at 250 and had a filter notch, advanced SMPTE cameras would underexpose it. Anyway who knows, whatever...
mr8mm
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 7:18 pm
Real name: john schwind
Location: California
Contact:

Post by mr8mm »

Answer to previous question: I stock 100D in R8 and DS8.

John S.
Post Reply