Is the super duper 8 or max 8 a scam?
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:32 pm
- Real name: kontrabass
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Is the super duper 8 or max 8 a scam?
For example this pic, I don't know which camera did it, but , if both S8 and R8 make 16:9 crop, their difference will be smaller , isn't it.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:32 pm
- Real name: kontrabass
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Is the super duper 8 or max 8 a scam?
carllooper wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the question. I'm sure you can work out what you are after from the diagram.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
- Real name: Carl Looper
- Contact:
Re: Is the super duper 8 or max 8 a scam?
You can work it out:kontrabass888 wrote:For example this pic, I don't know which camera did it, but , if both S8 and R8 make 16:9 crop, their difference will be smaller , isn't it.
On Standard8 the height (H) between the sprockets would be sprocket pitch (B) minus sprocket height (D):
H = B - D
= 4.234 - 1.143
= 3.091mm
The width (w) for 16:9 would then be:
W = H/9 x 16
= 5.4951 mm
area = H x W
= 16.9853541
Comparing to Max8 (or SuperDuper8)
SuperDuper8 is : 4.22 x 6.36mm
area = 26.8392
So the answer is, for 16:9:
Super8 (extended) = Standard8 (extended) x 158%
C
ps. note that the dimensions on wikipedia are incorrect (we all make that mistake), use this site instead: http://gcmstudio.com/filmspecs/filmspecs.html
And you have to subtract the sprocket height from the sprocket pitch to get the length between the sprockets.
--
Last edited by carllooper on Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:32 pm
- Real name: kontrabass
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Is the super duper 8 or max 8 a scam?
I found one pic , looks like it is more accurate than WIKI,and easier for calculation.carllooper wrote:
ps. note that the dimensions on wikipedia are incorrect (we all make that mistake), use this site instead: http://gcmstudio.com/filmspecs/filmspecs.html
And you have to subtract the sprocket height from the sprocket pitch to get the length between the sprockets.
--
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
- Real name: Carl Looper
- Contact:
Re: Is the super duper 8 or max 8 a scam?
Cool - I'll leave it up to you. It's way past my bedtime. Been a good chatkontrabass888 wrote:I found one pic , looks like it is more accurate than WIKI,and easier for calculation.carllooper wrote:
ps. note that the dimensions on wikipedia are incorrect (we all make that mistake), use this site instead: http://gcmstudio.com/filmspecs/filmspecs.html
And you have to subtract the sprocket height from the sprocket pitch to get the length between the sprockets.
--
--
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:32 pm
- Real name: kontrabass
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Is the super duper 8 or max 8 a scam?
Does anyone know which regular 8mm camera has so wide camera gate?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:32 pm
- Real name: kontrabass
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Is the super duper 8 or max 8 a scam?
I just took some pics to show the real size of camera gates of Bolex D8L standard 8mm camera and Braun Nizo 3056 super 8mm camera
on the left is Bolex, and right is Nizo
on the left is Bolex, and right is Nizo
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.