canon af310xl - any good?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Vlada
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 3:08 pm
Real name: Vladimir Miskovic
Location: Serbia, Belgrade
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by Vlada »

Jel someone wants to sell such a camera? (Canon AF 310 XL) silent

Vlada :)
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by Will2 »

Talk about an old post!

Keep an eye on eBay, they come up periodically. Biggest problem with them is the battery compartment. There's a fragile little plastic part that holds the batteries in and it constantly breaks. You then have to duct tape that part on for the camera to work. Not a big deal but inconvenient.

I'd sell you one but its not worth the effort of boxing it up for what they're worth.
zantizoom8
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:57 am
Real name: Real Name
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by zantizoom8 »

Forward, into the past.
Vlada
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 3:08 pm
Real name: Vladimir Miskovic
Location: Serbia, Belgrade
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by Vlada »

Will2 wrote:Talk about an old post!

Keep an eye on eBay, they come up periodically. Biggest problem with them is the battery compartment. There's a fragile little plastic part that holds the batteries in and it constantly breaks. You then have to duct tape that part on for the camera to work. Not a big deal but inconvenient.

I'd sell you one but its not worth the effort of boxing it up for what they're worth.

I like its design, a small,practical,light,almost enough to fit in a pocket :)
Looking for a long time, but here in Serbia does.
I like this model :wink:
mondo777
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:16 pm
Real name: Jon Nektar
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by mondo777 »

there was some mixing of cams in that orig post ie photo is of non AF version, talk is of AF version.

the original 310 xl is excellent - decent lens, well made

the AF version has a poor lens [i wouldn't buy another for that reason alone] and, as has been said, an awful battery compartment [mine bust first use]

get the non AF one. i still have two.
mr8mm
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 7:18 pm
Real name: john schwind
Location: California
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by mr8mm »

I have a 310AF sound. For birthday parties and christmas family filming it was great. Great low light camera but for serious filming not so much. The camera sound gave out before Kodak could cease producing sound film. Not certain it would work well with the new E100D. With TRI-X you can film in a cave using a match. Easy to use because it is light and compact. good for traveling. --J.S.
User avatar
Andersens Tears
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 2:13 pm
Real name: Jamie Noakes
Location: Östersund, Sweden
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by Andersens Tears »

I got one as for my son (then aged 3) as I thought it would be a great little camera for him to use. He shot one roll of film with it and the battery lock broke. Then he dropped it and the film compartment door broke. The plastic used for the body panels is really flimsy and dents/cracks really easy.

These cameras are often overpriced.

I got my son's camera from eBay.de for 5 Euros plus postage and it was MINT IN BOX.... (not for long!) :lol:

But yes if you want a very easy and basic pint and shoot for fun and nothing serious then it is a fun little camera!
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by Will2 »

Andersens Tears wrote:I got one as for my son (then aged 3)
That's exactly what I use mine for. I pass them out to kids on vacation and they have a great time. You can get wild short film segments that can be useful as cutaways.

Like in this:

https://vimeo.com/28847135

I have 6 AF310XL's or AF310XL-S's and 4 of those have tape holding on the battery compartments. Most of them bought for less than $30. If you're into Super 8 you'll want to pickup one serious camera eventually but these are great for fun.
mr8mm
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 7:18 pm
Real name: john schwind
Location: California
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by mr8mm »

Anyone have experience with the new 100D using this camera? I used 64T with great success in low light but have not tried 100D. --John S.
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by Will2 »

mr8mm wrote:Anyone have experience with the new 100D using this camera? I used 64T with great success in low light but have not tried 100D. --John S.
I've shot quite a bit but haven't projected it, just transferred so it's hard to tell what the exposure is like since the colorist fixes it. I have another 400 feet getting transferred next week so I'll ask for an exposure report.
mondo777
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:16 pm
Real name: Jon Nektar
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by mondo777 »

problem with mine was i was projecting at small size and it looked fine - if you want any decent sized image it doesn't look good though.

i found the AF fine. We had a discussion on here about AF super 8 cams as i assumed the AF system might be a work in progress. But I found the AF including the Canon 514AF system to be fine in most situations - way better than i thought.
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: canon af310xl - any good?

Post by Will2 »

They are just not continuous autofocus so if your subject is moving at all, you're out of luck. It focuses once when you pull the trigger and that's it.
Post Reply