music video i cut

Post by **sooper8fan** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:01 am

Film-0-Matic wrote:

though i dont see why they had to use film for this?

Because film is better.

Post by **paul** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:03 am

I tried the link yesterday and today. It doesn't work:

"Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /clips/paulm.mov on this server."

Best regards,

Paul

Post by **VideoFred** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:56 am

S8 Booster wrote:
for once a music video that doesent look like all the raw film is cut in 20 cm pieces by a scissor, mixed in a dry run washing machine and tape re-spliced onto a reel. hey, i can occationally fix my view for almost 2 secs ;-)

Haha! My idea..

Booster, it must be our age

However, if young people are watching these very nervous MTV clips all the time, they must become very nervous themselves.

And you know what?
They are...

Fred.

Post by **Nigel** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:21 pm

I like the video...Hated the song. When I turned off the volume and watched it a couple times It was really good.

Good Luck

Post by **teadub** » Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:14 pm

I'm with everyone else. Technically very good, especially the lighting and editing. And the defusion effect was pretty cool too.

How come all the shots of the singer in front of the wall paper is so cool? But the rest of the footage (including the lady/baby in front of the wall paper) is normal / warm? Stylistic?

Eitherway it's pretty neat. good job

Post by **T-Scan** » Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:32 pm

though i dont see why they had to use film for this?

And because digital slomo looks like crap, all jerky and shit. how many fps was that? 40?

Post by **mattias** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:16 pm

around 50, but we used one of those wild speed control boxes for the arri sr, so it could be anything i guess. unlike the older arri's the sr's don't have tachs either so it's impossible to know.

/matt