E64 Results

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
User avatar
audadvnc
Senior member
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by audadvnc »

T-Scan wrote:
As Super-8 production moves back to the USA
I should move back east and get a job at the Super 8 factory! I'd be like Willie Wonka!
No, you would be more like a painter on the Ford assembly line. Factory life is not all that exciting.

John - we're rooting for 7201 in Super 8. Are the sales in the other S8 formats sufficient to warrant this stock, or would this be a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul?
Robert Hughes
John_Pytlak
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 USA
Contact:

Post by John_Pytlak »

audadvnc wrote:
John - we're rooting for 7201 in Super 8. Are the sales in the other S8 formats sufficient to warrant this stock, or would this be a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul?
That question is a key one in the business case decision. Offering an additional film in Super-8 must either grow the market substantially, or be a needed and valuable addition for professional filmmakers and film schools.
John Pytlak
EI Customer Technical Services
Research Lab, Building 69
Eastman Kodak Company
Rochester, NY 14650-1922 USA
T-Scan
Senior member
Posts: 2331
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 9:19 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by T-Scan »

or be a needed and valuable addition for professional filmmakers and film schools.
A film like 50D in S8 would make me more confidant pitching the format for pro use. the cost of 16mm can scare easily.
100D and Vision 3 please
User avatar
audadvnc
Senior member
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by audadvnc »

But at the end of the project, the cost difference between Super 8 and 16mm may not be as large as originally thought, especially considering the extra fussing you have to go through to use S8. For instance, telecine is charged by the minute, and 16mm gives you many more choices of post houses to work with.
T-Scan
Senior member
Posts: 2331
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 9:19 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by T-Scan »

Even if I use Flying Spot, and would use nothing less for pro work, my last figures show S8 to be at least 40% cheaper than 16mm per running time. Thats assuming your getting the same rate on telecine. Most high end places that you would want to use for pro 16mm work (that don't even handle S8 can run up to $700 per hour.
100D and Vision 3 please
tlatosmd
Senior member
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Post by tlatosmd »

audadvnc wrote:But at the end of the project, the cost difference between Super 8 and 16mm may not be as large as originally thought, especially considering the extra fussing you have to go through to use S8. For instance, telecine is charged by the minute
Yes. About 50 cents to a Euro for broadcast quality SD. And that's not for telecining minutes, it's for footage minutes.
"Mama don't take my Kodachrome away!" -
Paul Simon

Chosen tools of the trade:
Bauer S209XL, Revue Sound CS60AF, Canon 310XL

The Beatles split up in 1970; long live The Beatles!
Post Reply