The best archival format for digital data in telecine work

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

Uppsala BildTeknik wrote:
I´m already addicted to this too! :lol:
I think I have somewhere between 23 to 26 250GB drives and maybe 10 160GB drives in a closet (they are too small for me, they just suck up electricity from my computers!)! :lol:
Kent, you need professional help :o
And a private electrical power company :wink:

Fred.
User avatar
Uppsala BildTeknik
Senior member
Posts: 2261
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:20 am
Location: Sweden, Alunda
Contact:

Post by Uppsala BildTeknik »

And a private electrical power company Wink
I know. I have serious thoughts about letting the computers get their own eletricity directly "from the connection point", they already have their own fuses in my house but I think this might be even better! :)
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

Uppsala BildTeknik wrote:
And a private electrical power company Wink
about letting the computers get their own eletricity
What about an old steam engine as a power supply? :!: :idea:

Fred.
User avatar
Uppsala BildTeknik
Senior member
Posts: 2261
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:20 am
Location: Sweden, Alunda
Contact:

Post by Uppsala BildTeknik »

Only if you come and shovel the coal to my steam engine! :lol:
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

OK, it's a deal!
But then I can play with the Flashscan, please?

Fred.
User avatar
Uppsala BildTeknik
Senior member
Posts: 2261
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:20 am
Location: Sweden, Alunda
Contact:

Post by Uppsala BildTeknik »

After 12 hours of shoveling coal you can play with it for 5 minutes.
Deal?
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

Deal! Thanks for being so generous! :lol: :lol:

Fred.
User avatar
Rusty
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:20 pm
Real name: Matt Doan
Location: Los Angeles, California
Contact:

Post by Rusty »

Alex wrote:
tlatosmd wrote:I wouldn't say analogue video would be that much more archival... :P
About 15 years ago I was given a 3/4 tape of a live 1979 television broadcast of a football game. The tape still plays fine.
I like the 3/4 inch umatic tape.I'm thinking of purchasing a deck because of the excelent picture I recall seeing about 40 umatic decks for sale at a swapmeet for about $75.

Does sony still make beta-max tapes?

sorry for bringing this topic back up.

Thanks
Rusty
"I think in art, but especially in films, people are trying to confirm their own existences"- Jim Morrison
User avatar
audadvnc
Senior member
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by audadvnc »

Betamax is long gone and only marginally better than first generation VHS. U-Matic is much better in all parameters, but the machines are very old and cost about $700 for refubishment (assuming they are working in the first place). And U-Matic tape is bulky. But it's an excellent archival medium for old videos - I've worked with 25 year old U-Matic tapes that still had a good signal. Betacam and Betacam SP are both much better formats than U-Matic; you can find used Betacam decks for pretty cheap - but don't use Beta SP tapes on them, or you'll wreck the heads.
Robert Hughes
Post Reply