Yes, Kodak is giving out 64t if you ask!
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
Re: Test Cartridges of E64T
Hopefully Kodak will keep a list of those who failed to return the questionaire and refuse them any test carts in the future. It is upsetting that those priveledged to receive a cart before anyone else were not considerate enough to fill out a questionaire.John_Pytlak wrote:only a handful of completed questionnaires have been returned. Professional filmmakers evaluating new 16mm and 35mm films from Kodak have a much better rate of response.
I'm disappointed in those who only think of this test as a way to get "free" film for personal use.![]()
Having beta tested a few games for Sony Playstation2, maybe Kodak should adopt similar requirements - non disclosure agreement, and a requirement to provide feedback or be excluded from future offers.
Just some off the cuff thoughts....
Scott
Independent Filmmaker
http://www.lytewave.com/
http://www.lytewave.com/
If they did go ahead and make a huge amount of this test film available while its still in the beta stage, I imagine that any griping and complaints about its poor performance might have multiplied accordingly.sooper8fan wrote:I think it would benefit Kodak to give out a ton of free test film (it's obviously there) and chances are, we'll like it enough to keep spending the money on it once it finally hits the shelves.

But I agree that the folks who got them should have participated in good faith. scott's idea about a future "no test" list sounds appropriately authoritarian.
And after the "sensitometry" (?!) has been tweaked and the film is ready for distribution, Kodak should give everyone who wants it a free cart out of principle.

Tim
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 7:05 am
- Contact:
I wonder if many who received test carts recently simply haven't shot and processed them yet, thereby lacking the data to fill out the questionaire.flyingsquirrelsnake wrote:I suppose I should comment that I haven't been able to shoot mine yet, with work and a combination of bad weather on days off. Michigan isn't the most predictable state in terms of clouds... especially on the lake!
I would expect 16mm and (especially) 35mm to be used mostly by pros and serious amateurs, both of whom might shoot more often and have easier (more cost-justifiable) access to processing.
Hopefully the S8 community will get those questionaires in to Kodak and prove not to be deadbeats. :roll:
Uh, maybe that's because they are... professional!Professional filmmakers evaluating new 16mm and 35mm films from Kodak have a much better rate of response.
Super-8 enthusiasts may or may not be pro filmmakers... if it's more of a hobby then they're not neccessarily going to be able to get it shot, telecine'd etc so soon as someone who's shooting 16mm every day... Don't be too harsh on people!

- Uppsala BildTeknik
- Senior member
- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:20 am
- Location: Sweden, Alunda
- Contact:
Hey Sparky, now that you can project the 64T again, does it seem as blue-tinted as the transfer? The chopped-up-and-spliced reel must be really good for evaluating the colors by projecting the reel.
Someone with a test cart left should shoot the same scenes with both the correct filter and with the built in filter in the camera. To judge how big the difference is in color, would be very interesting for those who want to project the film. For telecine I think color correction in post can take care of the small blueish tint.
EDIT: "How would you describe the responsiveness of the film to colour timing during the video transfer?" Color timing? If they asked for responsiveness to colour correction I would understand the question, but color timing?
Anyway, I didn´t play with it and try to colour correct it and stuff, I just gave it a quick onelight transfer... :?
Someone with a test cart left should shoot the same scenes with both the correct filter and with the built in filter in the camera. To judge how big the difference is in color, would be very interesting for those who want to project the film. For telecine I think color correction in post can take care of the small blueish tint.
EDIT: "How would you describe the responsiveness of the film to colour timing during the video transfer?" Color timing? If they asked for responsiveness to colour correction I would understand the question, but color timing?
Anyway, I didn´t play with it and try to colour correct it and stuff, I just gave it a quick onelight transfer... :?
Last edited by Uppsala BildTeknik on Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kent Kumpula - Uppsala Bildteknik AB
http://www.uppsalabildteknik.com/
http://www.uppsalabildteknik.com/english/
http://www.uppsalabildteknik.com/
http://www.uppsalabildteknik.com/english/
-
- Posts: 8356
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
- Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
but you're testing it for kodak, not yourself (although if there was no curiosity of course very few would volunteer). anything else is a misunderstanding.Sparky wrote:Surely the main reasons would be because it is new, and offered as a replacement to K40 and by definition unknown?
once it's released i'm sure kodak will keep giving out test rolls to people wishing to evaluate it for projects, no strings attached, just as they've always done.
/matt
-
- Posts: 8356
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
- Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
of course. that's what i meant by curiosity, but that's not why they gave you the cart.Sparky wrote:I think I was testing it for myself as well!
what's the difference? did you think they gave you a cart of a not yet released stock just to be nice or didn't you figure they wanted something back?And I didn't volunteer for anything- just asked for a test cart ;-)
/matt
-
- Posts: 8356
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
- Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
i was never referring to you in particular. i just don't think it's cool to apply to a beta test program and then not report your results. happens to me all the time, both with my software and my films. i understand that the motivation behind signing up is often strictly personal, but people should look at it from the other point of view. why do manufacturers send free stuff to people? enjoy the goods as much as you want personally, but if you're not prepared to report your results in a timely manner you shouldn't apply.Sparky wrote:Well I don't really care- I got what I wanted and will give them what they want
/matt