Unused cart of Ektachrome 160

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

User avatar
etimh
Senior member
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Unused cart of Ektachrome 160

Post by etimh »

Suppose you just bought a camera off a guy and he hands it over to you with an unused cart of Ektachrome 160, type A, in the film compartment.

Considering not only its age and its questionable 'in-camera" storage, but also, for those of you that might remember, the general characteristics of this stock, what would YOU shoot with this resurrected bit of film?

Of course I want to go ahead and use it on something, but I'm also wondering if it might be used for some productive "experiment," or applied in some interesting way to a particular subject.

Also, are there any unusual problems getting a discontinued stock like this processed?

Thanks for your time and suggestions.

Tim
Evan Kubota
Senior member
Posts: 2565
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:04 am
Location: FL
Contact:

Post by Evan Kubota »

"Also, are there any unusual problems getting a discontinued stock like this processed? "

I think so. IIRC the only place that can do it is Rocky Mountain Photo, for some absurd price ($30 a cart?) and it takes 6 months. I'd definitely shoot the film, but forget processing unless I remembered wrong and it's available for cheaper.
Angus
Senior member
Posts: 3888
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:22 am
Contact:

Post by Angus »

If the cart says EM-26 process then I would shoot it as it can be processed in E6.

Otherwise it is more than 20 years old, difficult to process and I woldn't bother.
The government says that by 2010 30% of us will be fat....I am merely a trendsetter :)
tlatosmd
Senior member
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Post by tlatosmd »

Just as Angus said, look out for 'EM-26', otherwise it's Evan's solution.

Anyway, I've stopped bothering about films that have already been taken out of their foils. They age so much faster, and there's no way to tell how much has been exposed yet.
"Mama don't take my Kodachrome away!" -
Paul Simon

Chosen tools of the trade:
Bauer S209XL, Revue Sound CS60AF, Canon 310XL

The Beatles split up in 1970; long live The Beatles!
anthony
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 9:18 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Post by anthony »

I have several catridges of Ekatchrome 160 Sound, stuck in the freezer all EM-26 process.

Theoretically then if they use the E-6 process, would that mean that Dwayne's would also be able to handle this stock as it will be the same process as E64, or are they developed slightly differently.

Might have tp drop Dwayne's a line and ask them??? what are everyone else's thoughts??


Thanks

Anthony M
chachi
Posts: 724
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:33 am
Contact:

Post by chachi »

anthony, the new 64T has no black backing. Your Em-26 stuff does. I doubt Dwaynes will touch it because of that. Your best bet is process it at home, or rather call them ask, then process it at home. :wink:
chachi
Posts: 724
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:33 am
Contact:

Post by chachi »

Tlatosmd, funny I read another thread about german ebay and thought to myself there goes the moviechrome for sale on there with the buy it now!

sure enough!
camera8mm
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 6:01 am
Contact:

Post by camera8mm »

I've seen the carts in cameras and a lot of times the square velvet light trap on the door melted onto the cart!
rocky mountain will process the em26, supposevly faster if you use the pk59 mailer, but the mailer was discontinued. they have to have enough em26 to process, otherwise they arent going to waste chemicals on a few rolls. I dont know how many rolls "enough" is for them to make a processing run.
tlatosmd
Senior member
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Post by tlatosmd »

http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie ... RK:MEWN:IT

You mean that auction that I've just used the 'buy it now' option of Chachi? The seller stated they were still sealed, and Agfa Moviechromes are my favorite starting with those when they changed their boxes from red to white background (two series, one with a white background and a blue stripe, the latest having a white background and blue and red stripes), it seems they changed their emulsion with their boxes back then.

Those white-boxed Moviechromes give what look like the most beautiful colors to me, even after they're outdated (still have to see the results of some Peruchromes and Revue Superchromes I shot in London which are still being processed by Frank). The only backdraw compared to K40 for me is the higher price as processing is not included, and those Agfa colors probably aren't as durable after processing as they are with Kodachrome (though I mostly shoot for telecine so it doesn't matter that much to me, actually).

BTW Chachi, what about that Moviechrome I sent you? How were your results?

Anyway, as for E6 processing, we have local labs like Frank Bruinsma and Andec for that over here in Europe, I'd be pretty sure that you guys have the same in the US or in NZ (which would probably be the closest on E6 processing in S8 for Australia) which is why some people are enthusiastically welcoming 64T.
"Mama don't take my Kodachrome away!" -
Paul Simon

Chosen tools of the trade:
Bauer S209XL, Revue Sound CS60AF, Canon 310XL

The Beatles split up in 1970; long live The Beatles!
John_Pytlak
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 USA
Contact:

Rem-Jet

Post by John_Pytlak »

Film that has the black "rem-jet" backing layer MUST be processed in a process that includes a prebath and rem-jet removal washes. Otherwise, it will contaminate the process, ruining your film and that of other customers.

E-160G and other similar films were NOT compatible with the E-6 process.
John Pytlak
EI Customer Technical Services
Research Lab, Building 69
Eastman Kodak Company
Rochester, NY 14650-1922 USA
User avatar
etimh
Senior member
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by etimh »

tlatosmd wrote:Just as Angus said, look out for 'EM-26', otherwise it's Evan's solution.

Anyway, I've stopped bothering about films that have already been taken out of their foils. They age so much faster, and there's no way to tell how much has been exposed yet.
It has "process EM-26" on it so I suppose there would be no problem having Rocky Mountain process it.

But you're right Evan, I checked and its $36.50(!) total. And processed on a volume basis, so who knows when you'd get it back.

Considering the questionable condition of the film, then, I guess I'll just use it to test motor functions, etc..

Too bad.

Tim
User avatar
etimh
Senior member
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Rem-Jet

Post by etimh »

John_Pytlak wrote:Film that has the black "rem-jet" backing layer MUST be processed in a process that includes a prebath and rem-jet removal washes. Otherwise, it will contaminate the process, ruining your film and that of other customers.

E-160G and other similar films were NOT compatible with the E-6 process.
Is this contrary to what they are offering here at Rocky Mountain?

http://www.rockymountainfilm.com/ekmovie.htm

Tim
tlatosmd
Senior member
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Post by tlatosmd »

Rocky Mountain are so specialized and high-end (and so expensive!) they do own processes for rem-jet films, I guess that's why they have their bulk system of waiting until they'll have enough for one process that they'll make ends meet with it.

As long as it says 'EM-26', Frank Bruinsma doesn't have a problem with these films, and he once stated to me those Ektachrome 160 films *older* than EM-26 actually are the ones doing damage to his chemicals, not the EM-26/E6-compatible. That's why I referred to small, rather local labs, not as high-end and expensive ones as Rocky Mountains Lab.
"Mama don't take my Kodachrome away!" -
Paul Simon

Chosen tools of the trade:
Bauer S209XL, Revue Sound CS60AF, Canon 310XL

The Beatles split up in 1970; long live The Beatles!
chachi
Posts: 724
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:33 am
Contact:

Post by chachi »

tlatosmd, the one you sent me worked out great!

thanks..
aj
Senior member
Posts: 3556
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:15 pm
Real name: Andre
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Rem-Jet

Post by aj »

John_Pytlak wrote:Film that has the black "rem-jet" backing layer MUST be processed in a process that includes a prebath and rem-jet removal washes. Otherwise, it will contaminate the process, ruining your film and that of other customers.

E-160G and other similar films were NOT compatible with the E-6 process.
Any suggestions on the chemical composition of this pre-bath?

The EM26 types have this remjet too.
Kind regards,

André
Post Reply