Black and white film?(super 8)
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:53 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Black and white film?(super 8)
Are there any other cheaper alternatives to the kodak black and white reversal films? I remember seing some russian labeld film on some online store, does anyone know the name of that film? One more thing, where can you buy the chemicals to process black and white film
''Mein Führer! I can walk!''
The cheap black and white Russian film is 'Quarzchrome' available from the Widescreen Centre (http://www.widescreen-centre.co.uk/cine.php). The widescreen centre will also process it.
Results have been variable according to comments on this board - I am waiting for my first roll to come back...
john..
Results have been variable according to comments on this board - I am waiting for my first roll to come back...
john..
cameras: Canon mvx250i / 518SV / 814E | GAF 738
projectors: Eumig S807 / Mark S
web: minimism.com namke.com
projectors: Eumig S807 / Mark S
web: minimism.com namke.com
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:53 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
namke wrote:The cheap black and white Russian film is 'Quarzchrome' available from the Widescreen Centre (http://www.widescreen-centre.co.uk/cine.php). The widescreen centre will also process it.
Results have been variable according to comments on this board - I am waiting for my first roll to come back...
john..
Thanks John! ill check it out imediatly
''Mein Führer! I can walk!''
Quarzchrome
I've tried home developing on a spiral I made myself - mostly following instructions on 'The Lab' page of this site. However, Quarzchrome really isn't worth bothering with. By the time you've bought all the developing chemicals, the cost of the film starts to matter a lot less than the terrible contrast you get from the Russian stock. We used Quarzchrome to try out and tweek the process - we got OK results from it but when we developed Plus-x the same way, it was so much better.
Ed
Ed
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:53 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
so its really not worth processing the film yourself...
Last edited by Dr_Strange_Love on Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
''Mein Führer! I can walk!''
Personally, I preferred the more contrasty look of quartzchrome to Plus X which, although finer grained, gives a very soft look. I had both developed professionally. However, the last two cartridges of quartzchrome both jammed in the camera - something which I have not had with the Kodak stocks. Also, I have not yet seen results with the new Plus X.
notches...
With regard to shooting, the one roll of QC that I have shot had a notch which would have told my camera that the film was 160ASA, despite it being a 50ASA stock. I taped in a piece of thin plastic to change the notch to the 40ASA position, I'll have to see how that worked!
My posts (and subsequent conversation) about the notches are here viewtopic.php?t=10317
john..
My posts (and subsequent conversation) about the notches are here viewtopic.php?t=10317
john..
cameras: Canon mvx250i / 518SV / 814E | GAF 738
projectors: Eumig S807 / Mark S
web: minimism.com namke.com
projectors: Eumig S807 / Mark S
web: minimism.com namke.com
Do the Widescreen Centre actually process the Quarzchrome or do they send it elsewhere? Anyone know if anyone else in Europe/UK processes it cheaper at all?
I like the stuff... I've never even considered the notching but it's always come out OK so far... low contrast but nice look!
I like the stuff... I've never even considered the notching but it's always come out OK so far... low contrast but nice look!
Tim Drage
films - http:///www.spiteyourface.com
noise - http://www.cementimental.com
"It's cheaper to shoot someone with a gun than a film camera." - amishman35
films - http:///www.spiteyourface.com
noise - http://www.cementimental.com
"It's cheaper to shoot someone with a gun than a film camera." - amishman35