16mm easy load.

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
scottbobo2
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 9:09 pm
Contact:

16mm easy load.

Post by scottbobo2 »

Hello,what is the easiest 16mm camera to load. I heard that it is the scoopic that correct. And is it a good idea to use the pop in loads from pro8mm? It would seem that the pop in loads would be just like the super 8 kodachrome films by kodak, pop it in a shoot, would anyone recommend this?. Thanks
User avatar
MovieStuff
Posts: 6135
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:07 am
Real name: Roger Evans
Location: Kerrville, Texas
Contact:

Re: 16mm easy load.

Post by MovieStuff »

scottbobo2 wrote:Hello,what is the easiest 16mm camera to load. I heard that it is the scoopic that correct.
Yes.

Roger
http://www.moviestuff.tv
downix
Senior member
Posts: 1178
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:28 pm
Location: Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by downix »

I'd actually say it is the Bell and Howell 200EE, but that's a magazine camera. Literally, slide the magazine in, close the door, ready to rock and roll. Of course getting the pre-loaded magazines is rather expensive....

For normal 16mm, the Scoopic is definately tops. A lot easier than my K-3 anyways.
User avatar
Uppsala BildTeknik
Senior member
Posts: 2261
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:20 am
Location: Sweden, Alunda
Contact:

Post by Uppsala BildTeknik »

How about R16? Is it easy? Doesen´t look too complicated to me.
I haven´t even given it a thought that it would be difficult to load, hopefully I am wrong... 8-[
ccortez
Senior member
Posts: 2220
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:07 am
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Post by ccortez »

Uppsala BildTeknik wrote:How about R16? Is it easy? Doesen´t look too complicated to me.
I haven´t even given it a thought that it would be difficult to load, hopefully I am wrong... 8-[
As daylight spool cameras go, R16 is horrible to load. I hate it. I often consider selling mine because of it.

To me, the Bolex and the Filmo are really easy.

R16 bad bad bad.

Sorry, Kent...
:(
User avatar
Uppsala BildTeknik
Senior member
Posts: 2261
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:20 am
Location: Sweden, Alunda
Contact:

Post by Uppsala BildTeknik »

](*,) :( OK, I suppose I will just have to give it a try, I will use leader the first time just to make sure I won´t ruin precious film. ](*,)
T-Scan
Senior member
Posts: 2331
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 9:19 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by T-Scan »

R16 bad bad bad
Try snapping the film in from the side into the sprockets. it goes in and catches real easy. I can load mine in less than 30 seconds.
100D and Vision 3 please
User avatar
audadvnc
Senior member
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by audadvnc »

I agree with downix, the 50' magazine cameras are instant load. They are essentially the direct ancestors of the Super 8 cartridge loading cameras.

You can reload the cartridges at your leisure in the darkroom for ready use in the field. I can change the film in a cartridge in about 5 minutes. But they are only 50' 16mm loads, meaning they run 90 seconds a cartridge, and they require 2 perf film which isn't as easy to find nowadays.

But the B&H 200 camera (the grey one in my avatar) is smaller than most Super 8 cameras, takes better pictures than any Canon, Nizo or Beaulieu, and costs $15 on eBay. What are you waiting for?
User avatar
audadvnc
Senior member
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by audadvnc »

And of course at the other end of the price & quality spectrum, the modern Arri SR's and Aatons are also magazine cameras designed for quick changing...
User avatar
reflex
Senior member
Posts: 2131
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:25 am
Real name: James Grahame
Location: It's complicated
Contact:

Post by reflex »

ccortez wrote:As daylight spool cameras go, R16 is horrible to load. I hate it. I often consider selling mine because of it.
I don't mind it. Fiddly, yes. Horrible? No.

Which explains why I'm trying to pull together the spare cash & gear to convince ccortez to part with his R-16. :)
www.retrothing.com
Vintage Gadgets & Technology
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Post by S8 Booster »

the scoopic has n autoload function like many s8 projectors.
takes care of the loops n all.

t
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

of the cameras that aren't automatic i think the arri s is the easiest because there's just so much room in there. you can do it with gloves in the winter.

/matt
User avatar
Scotness
Senior member
Posts: 2630
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: Sunny Queensland, Australia!
Contact:

Post by Scotness »

The thing with the R16 is you can use the 200foot magazines - if you have two you can have one loaded up and waeting and one on the camera ready to shoot at the start of the day.

The advantage is that you gain more than just time because overall you'll get less fogging when you load 200 feet than you will on 2 x 100 feet if you know what I mean - and on a long shoot you'll save a co0nsiderable amount of film.

Scot
Read my science fiction novel The Forest of Life at https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01D38AV4K
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

Scotness wrote:The advantage is that you gain more than just time because overall you'll get less fogging when you load 200 feet than you will on 2 x 100 feet if you know what I mean
except the 100 foot spools are really 110 foot spools for this very reason. or are you saying that the 200 foot spools hold 220 feet?

/matt
User avatar
Scotness
Senior member
Posts: 2630
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: Sunny Queensland, Australia!
Contact:

Post by Scotness »

Well they may hold 220 I don't know - I didn't know 100 feet spools were 110 - I guess it depends on how tight you wind it too - but if you're shooting short ends - which I do you don't always get exactly 100 to wind on to a spool - eg better to wind 180 feet on to a 200 foot spool than to split it into 100 and 80 feet and then get to fog two lots of film rather than one.

I spose the same goes when you don't shoot short ends but get it from a 400 foot core - even at 110 feet each you would have 330 feet plus 70 on the fourth daylight spool -- or just 2 x 200 feet.

Scot
Read my science fiction novel The Forest of Life at https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01D38AV4K
Post Reply