Idea for Homemade Telecine
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
You'll get near perfect single images from a frame by frame set-up.
Don't forget though, that if you get the physical set up absolutely spot on (and that is a challenge in itself) and get the computer end to be sufficiently reactive, you may get the system to cope with serveral frames per second.
A 50ft reel will give enough time to make a nice cup of tea!
If you simply video the film (at whatever speed) you won't get complete uninterupted frames, a fact that will just annoy when it comes to editing.
Don't forget though, that if you get the physical set up absolutely spot on (and that is a challenge in itself) and get the computer end to be sufficiently reactive, you may get the system to cope with serveral frames per second.
A 50ft reel will give enough time to make a nice cup of tea!
If you simply video the film (at whatever speed) you won't get complete uninterupted frames, a fact that will just annoy when it comes to editing.
- VideoFred
- Senior member
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
- Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
- Contact:
Thank you Giles for the link to my site :lol:
Already 28 visitors from your site! 8)
But my system is not DIY
:roll: EDIT: But it is DIY!! (see below) :roll:
About the Philips webcam: I don't use it anymore because my machine vision cam is a lot better, of cource.
However, this topic inspired me to do some Avisynth denoising on one of my ToUcam clips. The clip is also stabilized with the same Avisynth script, by using the depan plugin. (1 pass very fast stabilizing)
The result is very reasonable. (better than I tought)
Here's the clip:
ftp://ftp.filmshooting.com/upload/video ... oised_.mpg

Fred.
Already 28 visitors from your site! 8)
But my system is not DIY
:roll: EDIT: But it is DIY!! (see below) :roll:
About the Philips webcam: I don't use it anymore because my machine vision cam is a lot better, of cource.
However, this topic inspired me to do some Avisynth denoising on one of my ToUcam clips. The clip is also stabilized with the same Avisynth script, by using the depan plugin. (1 pass very fast stabilizing)
The result is very reasonable. (better than I tought)
Here's the clip:
ftp://ftp.filmshooting.com/upload/video ... oised_.mpg

Fred.
Last edited by VideoFred on Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- VideoFred
- Senior member
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
- Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
- Contact:
Yes, forgot to mention... It must be the ToUcam Pro II. This one has a CCD instead of CMOS. But as you see on my site, I made a new box for the ToUcam print, because on the original ToUcam the print with the CCD on it was not good aligned. With the original wide angle lens this does not matter, but for our purpose it does matter. Also, the IR/UV filter from the ToUcam is on the backsite of the lens, not on the CCD. If you use another lens, you have to add an additional IR/UV filter in front of it. Otherwise, you have poor colors.SuperDuper8 wrote:Ive spotted several ToUcams did you use the ToUcam PRO II 840K?
Patrizio
BTW: the ToUcam works fine together with Cinecap, my machine vision camera also.
Fred.
- VideoFred
- Senior member
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
- Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
- Contact:
Maybe I don't understand 'DIY' completely... Does this not mean 'from the wall'?mattias wrote:ok, that would mean that either you didn't build it yourself, or you're not using it for yourself. if a, who did, and if b, how much do you charge for transfers?VideoFred wrote:But my system is not DIY
/matt
a) and b): me and myself
But at this moment, I only transfer footage from others for testing purpose. To make a good living out of it, I should have to ask at least 3 Euros/minute, with this slow but fine system....
I make more money with my tooling company :mrgreen:
Fred.
- Uppsala BildTeknik
- Senior member
- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:20 am
- Location: Sweden, Alunda
- Contact:
Someone correct me if I´m wrong, but I think DIY stands for "Do It Yourself".
As in something the average man can accomplish himself without the need to hire someone for the task at hand, like to build a filmtransfer-thingy á la Videofred with a webcamera for their homemovies.
And your invention is DIY, at least in your hands.
If someone would try to make a living off your invention they wouldn´t be DIY-guys, but a company one could hire for filmtransfers.
As in something the average man can accomplish himself without the need to hire someone for the task at hand, like to build a filmtransfer-thingy á la Videofred with a webcamera for their homemovies.
And your invention is DIY, at least in your hands.
If someone would try to make a living off your invention they wouldn´t be DIY-guys, but a company one could hire for filmtransfers.

Kent Kumpula - Uppsala Bildteknik AB
http://www.uppsalabildteknik.com/
http://www.uppsalabildteknik.com/english/
http://www.uppsalabildteknik.com/
http://www.uppsalabildteknik.com/english/
-
- Posts: 8356
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
- Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
i'll quote the professor from maniac mansion and day of the tentacle, his answer to the question "what's a tentacle?".VideoFred wrote:Maybe I don't understand 'DIY' completely... Does this not mean 'from the wall'?
"oh, just something i whipped up in my spare time" :-)
and see kent's definition.
/matt
- VideoFred
- Senior member
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
- Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
- Contact:
Yes, that is why I a tought it was off the wall. The term is often used, here, for off the wall systems. Thanks for the explanation.christoph wrote:it means "Do It Yourself"... the most common solution with DIY super8 transfer is off the wall though ;)VideoFred wrote:Maybe I don't understand 'DIY' completely... Does this not mean 'from the wall'?
++ christoph ++
Fred.
Oooops international incident started.... appologies!
DIY - i.e. Do It Yourself - or in laymans terms, get some tools, bash some equipment around and come up with a fully functioning solution which matches exactly what you want for (hopefully) a fraction of the cost!
A few observations, I've been experimenting with a micro switch mechnism being actuated by the claw, i.e. when the claw pulls the frame down it then continues its cycle upwards to pull down the next frame. At this point the film is stationary, this is when the computer needs to be told to grab a frame. The switch is mounted to be actuated on the return portion of the cycle.
That's the very tricky bit, if this isn't 100% correct streaking will occur within the image as the latency in the switch/cable/mouse/computer/software chain will miss the stationary frame.
DIY - i.e. Do It Yourself - or in laymans terms, get some tools, bash some equipment around and come up with a fully functioning solution which matches exactly what you want for (hopefully) a fraction of the cost!
A few observations, I've been experimenting with a micro switch mechnism being actuated by the claw, i.e. when the claw pulls the frame down it then continues its cycle upwards to pull down the next frame. At this point the film is stationary, this is when the computer needs to be told to grab a frame. The switch is mounted to be actuated on the return portion of the cycle.
That's the very tricky bit, if this isn't 100% correct streaking will occur within the image as the latency in the switch/cable/mouse/computer/software chain will miss the stationary frame.
- monobath
- Senior member
- Posts: 1254
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:11 am
- Real name: Skip
- Location: 127.0.0.1
- Contact:
Would this SenTech STC 630CS II camera work for a DIY telecine? I picked up one for under $50 at an electronics store, but I was told they normally cost quite a bit more. I was going to make a surveillance cam out of it, but now I'm wondering if it would work well for telecine.
It has a 1/3 inch CCD. I really don't understand most of the specs, especially in the context of a telecine setup.
The specs for this camera are listed in the PDF: SenTech STC 630CS II
Anyone care to venture a guess as to whether or not it would be usable, and how well it would work?
It has a 1/3 inch CCD. I really don't understand most of the specs, especially in the context of a telecine setup.
The specs for this camera are listed in the PDF: SenTech STC 630CS II
Anyone care to venture a guess as to whether or not it would be usable, and how well it would work?