quarzchrome....

Post by **ccortez** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:27 pm

jhoneycutt wrote:
sunrise wrote: I found that it was less grain and less contrast than tri-x. I did not do plus-x test (yet).
michael
Have you shot any 16mm Fomapan? I was wondering how it would compare.

I just looked at some B&W 16mm that was shot in about 1950, and I have never seen such good looking B&W. I wish I could find some film to shoot that looks like that.

jack

When I got my R8 stock I ordered 2 16mm Fomapan from John Schwind. It's just waiting for my Switars to arrive so I can play with it in my (your) filmo. ;)

Post by **ccortez** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:30 pm

munnin wrote:I did the same, i underexposed some colour quarzchrome two stops and doubled the developer and 2nd developer times and it came out nice - I am not a purist though, and find enjoyment even in mediocre conditions

Is the color quarzchrome process E-6?

Post by **munnin** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:29 pm

I used a kit by ORWO, I don't know if it is E-6 or something else :?:

(by caming out nice I meant it looked like a 30's or 40's footage, high contrast and coool saturation, with grain) :twisted:

Post by **jhoneycutt** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:23 pm

ccortez wrote:When I got my R8 stock I ordered 2 16mm Fomapan from John Schwind. It's just waiting for my Switars to arrive so I can play with it in my (your) filmo. ;)

Take good care of my camera now :lol:

jack

Post by **Angus** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 2:32 pm

I have shot Fomapan in reg 8mm and briefly once on 16mm.

I find it beautiful and wish it were available in super 8

Filmshooting

quarzchrome....

Re: B&W film

Re: underexpose

Re: B&W film