Lucas Lightfeat wrote:Isn't this the problem with the eBay feedback system though - that there is a risk involved with giving a bad eBayer a negative, as they may do the same back to you.
Feedback really only means something to newbies on ebay that can't afford to have a high percentage of negatives. If a new ebay seller has an item that I want and they have, say, 12 negatives out of a total of 20 feedbacks, then that might indicate a bad seller. But if they have 50 negatives out of 2000 feedbacks, then I would account that to pissy buyers more than anything. The only exception might be if those 50 were recent and close together. That would indicate a trend and might give me pause before buying from this seller.
Lucas Lightfeat wrote:
It's because of this that some sellers receive money immediately for an item, but refrain from leaving feedback until the buyer has first. Even if an item I've bought has been a little suspect, I always leave a positive (so far) for fear of a reprisal.
Well, again, it really depends on the amount of positive feedback one already has. I have over 1000 transactions with only three negatives and they were all from asshole customers that were trying to defraud me, not the other way around. I never back down from people that threaten negative feedback because I know my positive feedbacks will always outweigh the negatives. Why live in fear?
Lucas Lightfeat wrote:Also, isn't it true that if I buy something and give a negative, the seller could give a negative in return as a bargaining position to get these negatives mutually removed?
One of my negatives was from someone that decided they would remove their negative feedback if I removed mine. I contacted ebay about a "mutual removal" and they said "nope". One of the other negative feedbacks I have was from a guy that ebay shut down because they found he was fraudulant. Ebay refuses to remove my negative feedback from this asswipe! Apparently it takes an act of Congress to get any feedback removed.
Roger