B&H 70-DR, 70-DL or 70-DA?... or Go With The K-3?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

jhoneycutt
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 4:23 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Contact:

Super 16 starter camera

Post by jhoneycutt »

jaxshooter wrote: I enjoyed shooting with the Bolex Rex and Beaulieu R-16.The Canon Scoopic was nice too,but I understand cannot be converted to Super 16.Both the Bolex and beaulieu convert nicely I'm told.
What would you recommend as a low cost starter Super 16mm camera?
If I am going to shoot some 16MM, I thought I would start with Super16.

jack
Canon 1014XL-S, Workprinter, Mac & PC
Freya
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:50 pm
Contact:

Post by Freya »

The A-Cam is almost certainly the cheapest actual S16 camera:

http://www.ikonoskop.com

At the really low end however you can get cameras like the bolex that have been converted to S16 for around 1000 to 1500 GBP.

...And of course the K3 Super16 modifications would probably bring a K3 serviced S16 camera in at about £500 GBP.

In theory the Filmo ia a very good candidate for S16 conversion, although I don't know anywhere that does it.

You don't really make it clear what you mean by low cost, and I wonder if you mean a real S16 camera or if you are considering converted cameras, it all depends.

love

Freya
User avatar
Andreas Wideroe
Site Admin
Posts: 2276
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 4:50 pm
Real name: Andreas Wideroe
Location: Kristiansand, Norway
Contact:

Post by Andreas Wideroe »

jaxshooter wrote:Both the Bolex and beaulieu convert nicely I'm told.
Actually, the Beaulieu camera can't be converted because of the optics. I don't know the exact technical reasons and I know some cameras that have been converted, but according to Björn Andersson who repairs and builds these cameras there are some big problems concerning this conversion.
Andreas Wideroe
Filmshooting | Com - Administrator

Please help support the Filmshooting forum with donations
Freya
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:50 pm
Contact:

Post by Freya »

awand wrote:
jaxshooter wrote:Both the Bolex and beaulieu convert nicely I'm told.
Actually, the Beaulieu camera can't be converted because of the optics. I don't know the exact technical reasons and I know some cameras that have been converted, but according to Björn Andersson who repairs and builds these cameras there are some big problems concerning this conversion.
Yeah, I remember a guy saying, and it might have been Bjorn actually, that although he had converted a few R16's long ago, it was such a difficult mess that he wouldn't do it again unless he was closely involved in the production of the film and pals with the director or something because it's too hard!

love

Freya
jean
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 3:29 pm
Location: germany
Contact:

Post by jean »

I always wonder why every 16mm film I buy is double perf. 8O Probably because the seller wanted s16, was forced to resell..
have fun!
Freya
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 5:50 pm
Contact:

Post by Freya »

jean wrote:I always wonder why every 16mm film I buy is double perf. 8O Probably because the seller wanted s16, was forced to resell..
Really? That's so strange! AFAIK double perf is now a special order from Kodak with a miniumum quantity, at least here in Europe!

Do you mostly get film from individuals freezers?

Orwo and fomapan is still available in double perf tho!

Do you tend to find it in large quantitys?

I guess in the past people used to send someone to buy the stock who didn't know so much what they were buying and when asked if they wanted single or double perf they would say "oh just the standard stuff" which probably got them double perf, and after all double perf does work in all 16mm cameras.

Now it's special order only tho, it's hard to imagine that happening.

love

Freya
rollemfilm
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:41 pm
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post by rollemfilm »

There is an HR for sale here:

http://www.ritzcam.com

Look under movie cameras. It has mags, motor and lenses! Sweeet!!
sound mixer
coors
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 4:16 pm
Contact:

Post by coors »

Rollemfilm,
Nice find! Best price I've seen! Looks like it may have gotten wet at one time... rusty motor and tripod mount. For a feature film, this would be great!... unfortunately, I need absolute lightness, mobility (looks like an AC motor on this one) and I would like to have a clockwork motor, as my whole purpose for a movie camera is simply to document my winter bicycling tours/adventures. Therefore, carrying "heavy" gear is out! I'll be limited to a 70lb. load which will have to feed, clothe and shelter me as well, for up to 2 weeks (or more) time.
Also... no one will ever witness my "work" save for myself and family (I have no friends) and even if I were to entertain thoughts of cinema work as a living, in truth I know that all this "movie making" endeavor will ever amount to for me is a non-profitable, hobby type, expensive way of filling the inner void inside that I feel each day. In time my interest in this endeavor shall wane just like with all of the other things that I've "gotten into" and I'll have to replace "moviemaking" with something else.
Sorry for the personal insight, but I felt it necessary to make my point... which is that any money that I spend on this stuff is not even "really" for the purpose of making a movie, but it's actually just something I'm doing to keep myself distracted from seeing how life is passing by each day and that I'm not doing anything to find out "what it's all about"... (rant over)

I intend to keep my 16mm investment as small as possible.



Owen
Last edited by coors on Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
Joe Gioielli
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 12:44 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Contact:

Post by Joe Gioielli »

I recently went through the same issue. Here is what I did.

I looked at a couple of B+H, they all went over $100. Figure about $20 - $40 for shipping (depending on if the seller charged handeling fees.) Sell a fair price for such a fine camera.

I emailed the sellers and asked every question I could think of. Being a believer in the goodness of the human spirit, I asumed that the people were truthful with me. The problem is, most of the people who were selling them hadn't used them and didn't know too much about them. Without seeling the camera, no way to know.

So I started looking at the K3. I looked up the camera on line. It seems the camera was reviewed in "Filmaker" magazine. (I don't know how to post a link to it, But it is on line.) I don't want to run the risk of a misquote, so I'll just say It was favorable.

So I went to ebay and looked at people who were selling K3s. I looked up the sellers "feedback", found people who had bought the K3 from the seller and asked them how the transaction went and what they thought of the camera. Of the 10 people I contacted,all said the deal went well. 3 hadn't used it yet. 7 had and were pleased with the results. No one had reported any lemons.

K3s from that seller are $140 plus $60 from FSR (I think Kiev, but who knows.) so that's $200.

$200 for the K3, $120 for the B+H, both are in the low cost bracket.
I can't say which is the better value. I haven't shot either one. But, based on what I had read, it seems that both cameras would be able to do all I would ask of them, namely take silent short sequences under well lit conditions.

So I decided I'd buy the K3. I like the idea that buyers were pleased with the specific seller and product. I have experiene with firearms made in the FSR and other communist countries. People often bad mouthed the quality of these weapons. Though not "high tech", I found them to be basic and reliable at a very low cost. Nothing fancy. My expectation is that the K3 will be the same. I expect it to be over built, heavy for its size, capable of doing a basic job. I will jury rig the battery for the light meter and use it, I expect it will disappoint. There my be feeding problems. I will try the auto load feature, I do not expect it to work.

I'm planning a little trip in August and (assuming I get the K3) I'll try it out. The proof is in the doing. So, if you can hold out for a little bit, I'll post with my thoughts on the K3.

I won't be able to tell you if the K3 is "better" than the B+H, but at least I will be able to give you a general impression of the K3.

Time to order more film, where did I put that credit card?
Zevon forever!
coors
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 4:16 pm
Contact:

Post by coors »

Hi Joe,
I'd be more than glad to read your review/opinion about the K-3! Reading peoples viewpoints about equipment is a favorite thing to do, for me. I'm in no real hurry, myself. I have just purchased a "Russian" Super8 camera and I wanted to test both this camera and a 16mm camera side-by-side... but the test will wait until I decide which 16mm I want...

Owen
ericMartinJarvies
Senior member
Posts: 1274
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 2:26 am
Location: cabo san lucas, bcs, mexico
Contact:

Post by ericMartinJarvies »

the b&h 16mm cameras are ultra cool as far as i am concerned. however, there are some things to look for when purchasing one. for starters, make sure it has variable speed .. many b&h models, especially the olders darker colored ones do not have variable speeds, not even 24fps. if you ever plan on using a film mag, make sure the camera has a hole in the back, either by model or by modification. if you can, have the seller wind up the camera and suing their little digital camera with 5-15 second movie/mpeg recording capabilities, have them record the camera while running, so you can hear it. if the camera is noisy, pass on it. a properly running b&h is not all that noisy ... n more so then a beaulieu r16, etc. to fine focus, make sure the model you are purchasing has the little optical focus element on the wind side of the camera/turret ... you merely rotate the lens turret from the gate to the focussing optic, and voila ... fine focus to a good degree of accuracy.

i have a bunch of these cameras right now, as well as alot of beaulieu cameras. converting the later model filmos to s16 is not a great deal of work ... but i have found that this largely depends on the actual shutter that is installed in the camera, and the machined gate area and gate plate ... sometimes there are not enough tolerances to allow s16 conversion ...and i am not certain if these are manufacturing differances or parts replacement by previous owners/repairs made during their lifetime prior to you having the camera. u16 is hands down the easiet conversion, and you cna digitally crop to s16 if needed.

the lead sheets that have thick foam rubber, the type used in car stereo installation houses, is a GREAT thing to line the inside of these cameras with ... coupled with undercoating spray, these cameras can be dampened to a very low noise output ... certainly enough for close outside sync sound filming. oil the hell out of the camera ... in fact, dunk it in a bucket of oil and let it soak for a day or two. then wind it up several dozen times and drain all the oil out and start cleaning until there is no oil oil leaking out. the coal tends to get very dirty and oxidized, as do the gears on the spring side of the chassis. when dunking a camera in oil ofr a day or two, you will have to remove the turret and clean the shutter and fine adjustment optic ... but you will NOT hurt anything by doing this, unless you have some type of fuzzy fabric lining in the camera that someone put in there. it is all metal otherwise. you cna use an air compressor and spray nozzle to remove excess oil.

there are many variations of the viewfinder in these filmo cameras. if you really want to tune your camera and make it very accurate as it relates to frmaing your images correctly, then mount the lenses you will use with the camera, and grab your pencil and notepad, and then mount the camera on a surface where it will not move during and after filming, even when you remove the film. take and run test shots using a 1 meter square piece of cardboard with smaller squares marked inside of one another, down to a little square i nthe center of the cardboard. now take and mount your lens or lenses on the turret, and turn the lens ot the fine focus optic helper on the wind side, and if the is a prime lens, like a 10mm, then move the cardboard back or forward until it the image in the fine adjustment optic is centered o nthe smallest inside marked square on the cardboard. then, take your viewfinder, which some of them have several adjustments that you can turn to, some only have one, some have two, and some have actual viewfinder optics. what you are doing here, is taking note of the relationship between the viewfinder and what actually is captured on the film. this is why the camera and the cardboard must be set to a fixed point and not moved from that point forward(for the same lens anyways). take and make note of what your viewfinder sees in frame on any of the adjustments, and mark what you actually filmed, so later when yo ahve the film processed and are able to view it, you can compare the two. you can also use a measureing tape placed o nthe cardboard, or use a specific measure between each square you draw. just whatever you do make sure it is consistant throughout the testing of any particular lens.

with this info, you can determine which viewfinder setting best matches the actual lens being used. in the case of the viewfinders that do not use optics, but rather, it is the rotating mattes of differant sizes, you cna actual remove this from its housing, and tape new cut-outs that represent the actual lens as per your tests. go to your local sign/vinyl plotter shop in town, and have them cut some frames as small as 1/4" and up, and make sure the frame utside the hole is large enough so you cna use scissors to cut down to size, and then apply to the metal matte tube. over time these will most likely curl a bit, but they will give you as close a frame as is possible considering the setup.

i have found that on the variable speed filmo cameras, one can(using a tobin speed checker $75.00 aprox.), adjust the running speed of the camera to 24fps constant(except for wind down and startup). therefore, you can literally shoot an almost crystal 24fps scene ... on one of my cameras, it run perfect 24fps without the speedchecker lights drifting out of sync!! that is pretty cool. you an use a mirror inside of the film compartment to see the speed checker.

if you can purchase an inside measuring micrometer from ebay for about $20.00, then you can correctly measure the distance from the mount to the film plain. then if you are handy, and if it needs to be adjusted to c-mount spec, you can do so failry easily using or removing washers, or by other means depending on the turret. one you know the distance you are working with as it relates to your turret, then you cna start correctly adjusting lenses you may purchase online. without a collimator, you will be requied to shoot actual film tests in order to correctly and exactly adjust your lens ... but such s life ... if you want nice images, this is something that will have to be done be it by you or some one else .. so it is part of the overall investment in the camera. you may find with some lenses that you purchase, that is is extremely difficult to adjust the c-mount that is attached to the lens ... which you will need to adjust forward or bckward, depending on the turret flage distance/measurement, and the actual lens. remember, your turret does NOT need to be the spec c-mount distance ... the lens can always be the one that is adjusted if you are unable to adjust the turret, and vice versa. in fact, i would bet that many techs do this ... or tech that prefer to take shortcuts, becuase it works either way.

the real bummer about removable lens cameras is the lens ... it is impossible to purchase a lens that is correctly adjusted to the c-mount standard ... and this applies to the actual camera. most of the time, as mentioned above, the tech wil ladjust the lens to the specific camera body, usually disregarding the turret flange distance. i say this becuase it has been my own personal experience and findings with all of the various cameras and lenses i have purchased on ebay ... and it really makes sense when you think about the history of any one given camera and one given lens ... and how they have been used on 'x' amount of cameras over years and years, with many techs and many do it yourselfers making them work together .. .but not exactly making them work according to spec.

great little cameras for a great price ... it is hard to go wrong with one of them.
eric martin jarvies
#7 avenido jarvies
pueblo viejo
cabo san lucas, baja california sur. mexico
cp 23410
044 624 141 9661
jean
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 3:29 pm
Location: germany
Contact:

Post by jean »

Eric,

what micrometer are you using? I'm currently looking for something, but am not sure yet what I need, I guess the 0.001 mm tolerance devices are required, and I wonder how a working setup should be..

My project is to bring the cameras and lenses I use to spec, so I can interchange them. :D
have fun!
rollemfilm
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:41 pm
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post by rollemfilm »

Owen, All DR & HR cameras are clockwork cameras. The motor and mags are for optional use. But, if you are looking for light weight, the Bell & Howell is not for you. These cameras are heavy, and the HR is the heaviest of them all.

Although a decent DA might be better. They have the same movements but the viewfinder is smaller. If this for travel, you may want to stay with super 8.
sound mixer
downix
Senior member
Posts: 1178
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:28 pm
Location: Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by downix »

I've been looking at a DA myself, after using a DA and a DR. While the DR is a beefier camera, the DA's can be found for a lower price and the difference is not great enough for me to care. 8) My 16mm is a Keystone, personally, and purrs like a kitten.
ericMartinJarvies
Senior member
Posts: 1274
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 2:26 am
Location: cabo san lucas, bcs, mexico
Contact:

Post by ericMartinJarvies »

jean wrote:Eric,

what micrometer are you using? I'm currently looking for something, but am not sure yet what I need, I guess the 0.001 mm tolerance devices are required, and I wonder how a working setup should be..

My project is to bring the cameras and lenses I use to spec, so I can interchange them. :D
jean,

it is very difficult to interchange lenses with differant cameras bodies using the same mount adjustment that is on each particular lens UNLESS each and all of your cameras and their respective turrets are adjusted to c-mount factory specifications as it relates to the flange distance. however, if you so desire to spend the time to correctly adjust the turrets on each of your c-mount cameras so they are all the same, then you will be 10 steps ahead of the game as it relates to ease of use in the interchangable lens catagory.

in the following photos, you will see a depth micrometer. the cross surface is what is used on the outside surface of the turret, thus establishing a fixed place to start your measurements. this does NOt mean you the c-mount flange distance ends or starts at this point ... it may be that you have to do some deducting or addition based on the extra surface area that may be caused by the micrometer cross section and the surface on the turret. so, like all things of this nature, you must pull out the ol pen and paper and start taking notes/measurements, so you can establish a zero point with which you add or remove measurement/distance upon/after film testing. so for your initial measurement/test, you will tkae the micrometer and place it on the outside surface of the lens turret so it is flat/flush against the turret. take and them measure the distance to the film plane ... so make sure to place some film in between the pressure plate and the micrometer and close the pressure plate as if you were filming. write down that measurement. determine the distance between any excess surface area outside/above the actual c-mount threading area, and deduct that from the measurement. this should give you the flange distance. if you do not know how to get the masurement from the thousanths indicator on the micrometer, then use a seperate measurement ruler to measure the amount of probing rod that is protruding on the micrometer ... in most cases you will be around 15-19mm. with time and practical application, you will start refining your ability to measure, so you can indeed obtain a measurement reading like 17.52mm.

once your turret/c-mount threaded mount piece on the outside point to the actual film emulsion is 17.52mm, then your lens turret is to factory spec. repeat this process for 3 lens turrets. if you find or learn that your terret is warped or bent ,and one or the other two c-mounts are measuring differantly, then you will need to remove the turret, and with a vice and pressure or hammering tools, gently start bending back into place, and continue measuring each mount until they are all at 17.52mm. if you are not ble to get all of them to this measure for whatever reasons, then get them to a measurement that is the same for all three, and then focus on making the adjustments on the actual lens/lens mount. but for what you are posing, you will want all of your camera bodies to be the same factory measure, so spend the time and make it happen.

now then, we are dealing with the lens. the lens must be measured from the actual male threaded c-mount on the outside edge ... the distance of the back glass has nothing to do with the mounts being correctly measured, but the back glass DOES have everythin to do with the measure between itself and the lens' mount. understand? now what you will find, and this is where things really become a practice in documenting all the measurements, is that not all threads are created equal. you may have 3 c-mounts on your turret, and one of them may thread deeper then the other two, or some variation of the sort along these same lines. this may also be the case with the threads on the lens' mount. so this is where marking the lens and the mount in the same place that the lens stops threading plays a crucial role in having repeatable success with interchanging your lenses. for the sake of simplification, take and designate one of the three turrets for a specific lens, and adjust that lens for that one turret. so when you are changing lenses, you will always use your switar 10mm on lens mount number 2, on camera number 3, for example. unless you cna verify that all of the threads on each of the c-mounts on the turret are the exact same when that lens tightens down, you will need to employ this practice.

so after marking the points with each of your lenses on each of the mounts, take and roll film tests. take and film using various measurements and an object or chart out in front of the camera as these particular measurements ... which are the same measurements on your foccusing ring on the repsective lenses. what you will want to establish here is if the lens is indeed in focus at any one of it's particular distance measurements. so if your lens has a 10". 1', 3', 10'. etc. markings on it, you will want to place an object at those distances. however, you will also want to place an object at the distance, and then adjust the lens in both directions(closer or further focus). this way, when you see your film, and you compare the focus of the image on film to your notes, you can see if your lens if to far out or too far in to the film plane. for example, lets say you have an object at 5', and your lens is set at 5', and after viewing the film you notice it is out of focus. if you did not bother to adjust closer or further away, you will not know what adjustment on your lens actually does give you the correct focus at that lenght. you need to know this at all markings on your lens so you can adjust your lens correctly. now it may be that your lens needs to be collimated, in which case merely adjusting the mount on the lens will not bring your focal lenghts into correct measure. for example, your lens may be dead on at 1', but at 20' it is out of focus. but these are things you need to learn for yourself so you understand the relationships going on between the optics in the lens to the lens' mount, and the lens' mount to the film plane. you will figure it out IF you write everything down while conducting the tests and making sure to measure things correctly.

jean ... it is merely an excercise in establishing a fixed point/location, or a zero point/location, and then basing all of your measurements from these. this applies to the micrometer and the surfaces it is resting upon(where the road meets the rubber in other words). it applies to the focal lenghts and the distance of measure in from of the lens or the flange or the mount(again, you can use any of the three, just add or subtract and always stick to just that one you have selected).

people purchasing cameras on ebay would be doing themselves a favor to spend the extra money in purchasing a camera from a person who has been recently filming with it, wherein that seller cna indeed answer questions as it relates to the nuances of the camera, thus providing you with detailed information of how the camera functions and what measurements/indicators need to be repsected when filming, so the images are in focus. or, if you like to do these things(like i do, and like it seems you do as well), then learn how to do it now, so that for each lens and/or camera you purchase later, this process becomes routine. if you are planning on becoming a cameraman for a profession, knowing this information goes a LONG ways. the other things to know are your dof's, filters, and chemical processes while developing. in hollywierd, there really IS a shortage of well informed camera men ... so this knowledge becomes an asset if you can apply it correctly. this is why dop's who have shot a shit ton of music videos are so damn good with a camera ... they know the relationships between the lens the camera and the film ,and all the other things like lighting and filtering and so on. being well rounded in this regard can make or break a film.

right now in television production, wherin the director has 7 days to prepare and 7 days to shot, error MUST be kept to a minimum, so when these directors find good cameramen, or rather and more often then not, when the producer's of the show find good cameramen, they keep them, becuase it is one of the greatest worries of the production that can be put to rest because the dop can be counted upon to get the right image ... in focus.

if you have some extra money, purchase a single chip, inexpensive c-mount camera head and plug it into your computer for capture ... use this to learn to adjust your lenses to that camera body. it is an excercise that is of extreme value for anyone considering this as thier profession ... some would argue most tv series products would rather pay for an onstaff camera tech ... but some would argue otherwise :)

i think that the majority of the people on this site, myself included, end up getting frustrated and spendign less time filming as a result of these very types of issues. to get a camera in tune, exactly where it needs to be, is indeed a process and one that requires a great deal of attention. i look back at the first film i shot about 18 months ago, and then the film i shot 12 months ago, and then the film i shot 6 months ago, and the film i am shooting now, and the differance between them are great. and the number 1 contributing factor is the time i have spent learning how to correct tune and keep tuned my camera(s). if you rely solely on a camera tech to keep your camera tuned, then you fail to know what you should know about your camera, which is the very thing that will make or break the images you eventually film. and from first hand experience, the good techs available, and often mentioned on this site and other sites, have so much back load that they end up taking forever ,and sadly and in many cases their work is less then satisfying ... at least for my level of quality discernment. because most filmmakers are starving and struggling and can barley afford to purchase a roll of film, it makes sense to spend the time to figure these thigns out, because then you stand on your own two feet, and have the ability to correct any such problems that may occur durign filming, and if you are actively working on your own projects, one after the other, then you will also start working on other people's projects ... why? becuase your product looks good, and you have proven to those who have seen it that it looks good, and you are responsible for this fact. this means someone will use you becuase they cna depend on you.

i went about my own filmmaking aspirations the wrong way, saying this in hindsight, but also knowing there really could not have been any other way. if i had to do it all over again, i would have STARTED by writing a one page film. with an intro, and problem, and a solution. i would have then taken and purchased a couple rolls of film, found some people ot rehearse the one page screenplay, and then i would have shot it(i would have done the above mentioned camera adjustments and film test before hand). then, i would have edited it, added sound to it, and completed it, and posted in here on this site. and then, i would do it all over again, with 2 or 3 pages ,and a little deeper storyine, or perhaps an installment to the first short film i shot. and then i would have finished it. and kept going. instead, i started out by wanting to go into a bg full feature length production ... and had i been able to maintain control over everything, menaing having the knowledge and experience to do everything, then all would have bene well. but this is not realistic. the truth is, you will experience the same set of challanges on a 1 page screenplay as you will on a 120 page screenplay, so it is wise to start with the 1 pager.

so, in my own experiences, and with my other non film projects that were already in the works, i was NOT able to make my feature film as was planned. and good thing i suppose. so in a couple of months after i complete my construction projects, i will shoot my one page film, and do as i have mentioned above ... because right now i have more family films and film test footage then i would like, but i do not have a film, not even a short one page film :)

live and learn ... thus is life. i hope this information was of some use.

eric

Image
Image
Image
Image
eric martin jarvies
#7 avenido jarvies
pueblo viejo
cabo san lucas, baja california sur. mexico
cp 23410
044 624 141 9661
Post Reply