Had an idea about a new scanner

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

seekaee
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 2:44 am
Contact:

Post by seekaee »

Roger, if this was`made, would it be dual compatible with both S8 and 16mm? Sign me up if you say so!
skyliner
Posts: 160
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 10:43 pm
Contact:

Post by skyliner »

science grade glass filters after the lamp should be just fine, and of course, you can correct for lamp color temperature as an intrinsic part of the process.
Lets get prototyping :)
Carlos 8mm
Posts: 980
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 11:24 am
Location: going bald!
Contact:

Post by Carlos 8mm »

Hi Roger,
which kind of B&W vidcam has better resolution: B&W CCD cameras or B&W tube cameras? Remembers that ccd cameras are limited by the number of elements of the CCD, whereas a tube camera forms the image by means of a continuous beam (yeah, analog!! 8) ) but that analog cameras has the typical "memory" defect when the intensity of light is very high. I have a B&W tube Phillips camera from the early 80´s, so maybe will do some tests.

Carlos.
User avatar
Scotness
Senior member
Posts: 2630
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: Sunny Queensland, Australia!
Contact:

Post by Scotness »

Brilliant idea Roger - I've said it before and I'll say it again - you're a genius! - I bet you can't stop thinking about this kind of stuff if you try.

I'd definitely be interested in one particulalry if it does 16mm as well - this is the kind of invention that would keep indie film makers like me (and all of us) in film and not video

Anyway I'll follow it's progress with great interest.

Scot
Read my science fiction novel The Forest of Life at https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01D38AV4K
GeneratriX
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:09 pm
Real name: Diego A. De Giorgio
Location: Rosario / Santa Fe / República Argentina
Contact:

Scanner Programming...

Post by GeneratriX »

Roger,

I'm new on this forum, and I'm a lot interested on your project.

In fact, if you need programming for the thing, feel free to drop me an eMail or P.M.

I'm a full-time graphics programmer, and I have skills to put on C++ code all what you can need to get your new scanner working.

As a guide, check my current programming projects (actually for Silicon Graphics IRIX platform, but I can work with other platforms too), were you can find a completely real time framework, with: several forms of color correction, several forms of geometry correction, motion blur, time base correction, etc...

My current page is: http://www.geocities.com/generatrix_vcs

I can do the programming for the mechanism automation too.
Best regards,

Diego

P.S.: and I could be happy accepting a scanner as payd! ;)
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Proxxon

Post by VideoFred »

I was thinking about something like this:

Image

You could replace the milling machine with the camera...
The film mechanism could be mounted on the cross-table.
With this unit, you could do v-e-r-y fine adjustment.
And there is plenty of room for everything, too.
A unit like this cost about 150 Euro.

Fred.
Dave Anderson
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 3:41 pm
Location: Bemus Point, NY
Contact:

Post by Dave Anderson »

Wow. THat's a cool drill press! So you're thinking to mount the camera where the drill is? How would the projector mount?

I would think just to have the x/y platform to mount the camera on would be worth the price of admission!? Heck with the drill.


Dave
Dave Anderson
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

Dave Anderson wrote: So you're thinking to mount the camera where the drill is? How would the projector mount?
Dave
No projector at all.... Just a gate, transport mechanism and backlightning.
Maybe build with parts from old projectors...
But those parts can be made in small series, too.
It could be build very simple, but fine... :wink:

Fred.
downix
Senior member
Posts: 1178
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:28 pm
Location: Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by downix »

Sounds like a great idea. A suggestion tho: allow for color-negative (invert the color filters used) and allow for true B&W. A trick I did ages ago for color negative used CMY filters in lieu of RGB. Worked quite well too
StopMoWorks
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 5:21 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

Post by StopMoWorks »

MovieStuff wrote: This isn't really aimed at the home movie market. I already sell tons of the WorkPrinter and CineMate units to cover that. This is strictly an item for the type of people on this forum that digitize their own movies, want convenience and high quality, but aren't concerned about speed. Basically, your own mini-Rank sort of thing. I think it would be cute. Roger
Hmmmm ...... stop motion or just animation in general is a slow process anyway and so we are accustomed to that and speed is not a concern. In animation world we deal with individual frames and 50 feet is more than plenty for us (compared to live-action shoots) to do some intenstive animation sessions. Just my little self-interest bias ..... lobbying here :D
>> |_ | () <<
Stop Motion Works
http://www.stopmotionworks.com
Post Reply