Retro 8 WIN!

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
milesandjules
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:22 am
Location: brisbane australia
Contact:

Retro 8 WIN!

Post by milesandjules »

Had a horror transfer job recently..

A client came to us with rolls and rolls of 8mm that went through a flood 5years back. But unfortunately he had been told to soak the film in water and then when he saw the emulation coming off in the water he panicked a put all the film in the freezer for 5years. 8O

So we immediately unspooled the wet film…into big spaghetti piles to let the film dry. The film was so warped and swollen that it had burst its plastic spool on many of the reels.

So then we tried to transfer the film. We were using a hacked projector for the transfer….but when the warped film sprocket missed the projector claw the image would shake until one of us noticed. So we managed to transfer it but it took days to do it. Then we tried to edit out all the shakey bits of footage and there was to many to do…..So we kind of left it in the computer for a few months…..then a couple of weeks back the client rang up wanting his film :oops:

luckily our retro 8 had arrived and we did the transfer on it. The film sailed through the retro 8 without a hitch. The constant speed of the scanner is exactly what we needed. No editing was required. the footage played back fine no shaky bits. So another win for the retro 8…Nice work Roger. 8) The machine was left coated in a layer of emulsion powder and mud dust….but after a quick clean …it was ready for action again. Some of the footage looks so bazaar from where the water has attacked the film…..Alot of image was missing from the film…but i think the machine did the best job possible with this instance.

Image

sometimes the film was fine
Image[/URL]

but here is some of the cool looking messed up frames

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

[Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

Image[/URL]

When the footage play at normal speed it look like some animator on lsd has animated them he he :P
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: Retro 8 WIN!

Post by Will2 »

Sounds like a good testimonial for Roger's website!

Congrats on pulling it off, I'm sure the family was grateful for any images at all.
Roster
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 12:31 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: Retro 8 WIN!

Post by Roster »

What an interesting undertaking and a great testament to the Retro 8 (I really need to start using mine).

Your true life story will surely be adapted to a 'found footage' type of narrative film.

I think I'll start working on that right away!
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!"
milesandjules
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:22 am
Location: brisbane australia
Contact:

Re: Retro 8 WIN!

Post by milesandjules »

Hey guys thanks for the feedback….Yep the retro 8 worked perfect for this job... and I grabbed the stills using it frame grab function from the rendered video files. Yeah i hope the family liked the film.

I was surprised... the best looking films were the standard8 reels. It seemed to handle the water better than the newer super8 kodachrome. Could it be that it was the original Kodachrome type 1 and has better fixer or something than latter film?…..cause there was hardly any degradation from the 5years of soaking….Or maybe it was just less wet …but i think it was something to do with the film type.
Tscan
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:44 pm
Real name: Anthony Schilling
Contact:

Re: Retro 8 WIN!

Post by Tscan »

I've been scanning a big batch of regular 8mm from the mid 60's for a client all week and I can't believe how good it looks. Not only do the colors of the 50yr old Kodachrome look like it was shot last week, but the scanner does an amazing job of capturing it.
Reborn member since Sept 2003
Post Reply