Webcam Video Assist

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

User avatar
MovieStuff
Posts: 6135
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:07 am
Real name: Roger Evans
Location: Kerrville, Texas
Contact:

Re: Webcam Video Assist

Post by MovieStuff »

carllooper wrote:I don't have any real reason for using an anamorphic. In many ways one will get a better print not using an anamorphic, at least in terms of the anamorphic options being considered.

C
That is correct. Anamorphics do not lend themselves to close up work at all. In my previous life doing special effects, we found that it was much easier to shoot miniatures with spherical lenses and then have them optically printed to anamorphic, if necessary. As an interesting side note, all the hand painted titles of films from the golden age of Hollywood were just painted with the "squeeze" built into the artwork so they could shoot the art with spherical lenses up close. The anamorphics would later unsqueeze their art upon projection.

Roger
carllooper
Senior member
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
Real name: Carl Looper
Contact:

Re: Webcam Video Assist

Post by carllooper »

MovieStuff wrote:Anamorphics do not lend themselves to close up work at all. In my previous life doing special effects, we found that it was much easier to shoot miniatures with spherical lenses and then have them optically printed to anamorphic, if necessary.
Yes, I've discovered conventional anamorphics are not very good for close up work. For optically printing spherical to anamorphic it's the same constraint of course, ie. it's closeup work as well, but I guess for printing one can put together an eccentric system that just works for that setup. No need to alter it's parameters as you would otherwise do when shooting camera original.

Re. solutions in search of a problem - I'm quite into that philosophy - I often stumble across certain ideas for which I don't know in advance what problem they might solve (if any). But I get into them anyway. Solutions in search of a probelm. For example the lenticular sheets I purchased a few months ago - I wasn't sure for what purpose I'd use such (other than a 3D display) - but as it turns out a solution to the problem of how to diffuse the LED light source on the printer projector occured to me as I was staring across the studio space at the lenticular sheets. And the use wouldn't have occurred to me if I hadn't been studying the lenticular sheets themselves, ie. independantly of any reasons one might have otherwise had for having lenticular sheets sitting in the corner of the studio.

Indeed, is not a computer the ultimate solution in search of a problem? I recall the early days of home computing (late seventies/early eighties) and a common question was "what is it for?" In many ways we've had to invent the problems for which the computer would be the solution. I don't know if this is back to front thinking but it often works quite well and in weird sorts of ways. I'm often thinking of some solution without a problem when someone calls me with the exact problem for which I have the solution! Its perfectly strange but it happens enough I just treat it as some sort of strange way the universe works!

There's all sorts of other examples. For example, the fact that silver turns black in the presence of light. It can be regarded as a solution to a problem that sat around for two thousand years before someone thought of the problem, the problem being: how to create a photograph.

C
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
Post Reply