B&W Outdoors 5222 vs. 5234

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

B&W Outdoors 5222 vs. 5234

Post by Will2 »

Interesting test that Tommy at Video Film Solutions published about using Kodak 5234 B&W intermediate lab stock outdoors since Double-X has an ASA of 250 outside. This intermediate B&W stock would have an ASA of about 18, but on a bright summer day it could be a great alternative, sharper and a little cheaper too. It's available in 35mm and 16mm from Kodak.

http://www.videofilmsolutions.com/the-lab

Image

There are a bunch of interesting articles on his site now so I suggest checking them out. He's a brilliant tinkerer and was raised around film processing. Rates for processing and transfer are amazing by the way and the quality if top notch.
User avatar
Andreas Wideroe
Site Admin
Posts: 2276
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 4:50 pm
Real name: Andreas Wideroe
Location: Kristiansand, Norway
Contact:

Re: B&W Outdoors 5222 vs. 5234

Post by Andreas Wideroe »

Thanks for posting Will. Very interesting company and projects indeed. Have a look at their inhouse built scanners. There's a lot of potential if you know your electronics and coding.

And by the way, the filmstock (5234) looks excellent. We've discussed using a similare filmstock here to do some resolution tests a couple of years back. We never did it, but here you see how great they can look.

/Andreas
Andreas Wideroe
Filmshooting | Com - Administrator

Please help support the Filmshooting forum with donations
User avatar
Nicholas Kovats
Posts: 772
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:21 pm
Real name: Nicholas Kovats
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: B&W Outdoors 5222 vs. 5234

Post by Nicholas Kovats »

The 5234 appears to be a gorgeous stock. It would be worthwhile to have the 16mm version reperfed.
Nicholas Kovats
Shoot film! facebook.com/UltraPan8WidescreenFilm
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: B&W Outdoors 5222 vs. 5234

Post by Will2 »

It would be worthwhile to have the 16mm version reperfed.
I find myself shooting 16 outside on sunny days all the time so I like the idea too. When you say reperfed, do you mean for regular 8? There's a 7234 ready to go for 16mm cameras already. Probably comes on 2000 foot rolls but easy to spool it down to 100' or 400' loads.

*edit: Oh, I see; you mean for the converted Bolexes...makes sense. Great summer stock.
User avatar
Nicholas Kovats
Posts: 772
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:21 pm
Real name: Nicholas Kovats
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: B&W Outdoors 5222 vs. 5234

Post by Nicholas Kovats »

That's correct. I was referring to Regular 8 for the UltraPan8 Bolex cams.
Nicholas Kovats
Shoot film! facebook.com/UltraPan8WidescreenFilm
Post Reply