A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
hirudin
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:58 am
Real name: Jesse Andrewartha
Contact:

A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by hirudin »

Hi All!

Just got back my latest film, this one is a film test for an upcoming short film I'm working on... this was filmed over three dives and was intended to test framing, lighting and get my weighting correct... these dives were way off but I think I'm improving. They were scanned in SD and the vid is a rough cut, so there's plenty of issues.

Anyway, enjoy.

https://vimeo.com/61628293

Thanks!

-Jesse-
User avatar
Mana
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 9:27 am
Real name: Todd Pinder
Location: Honolulu
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by Mana »

Beautifully sharp! Bet it looks great projected! Did you set the lens a f8 or something and zone focus?
R8: Bolex B8

S8: Beaulieu 7008 Pro, Beaulieu 4008zm2 "Jubilee", Leicina Special, Eumig Nautica (24fps)

DS8: Bolex H8 Rex4

S16: Bolex Rex4
hirudin
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:58 am
Real name: Jesse Andrewartha
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by hirudin »

Thanks!

The lens was a 5.5mm preset Switar, and the focus was set to infinity at f2... at this setting the focus is about 2.2ft to infinity... awesome!

-Jesse-
User avatar
BAC
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:27 pm
Real name: Bryan Chernick
Location: Bothell, WA
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by BAC »

That looks great Jesse, you're becoming the master of 8mm underwater photography! How deep can you go with that housing? I recently came across a Nemrod Siluro Underwater Camera that was made between 1960 and 1966. It's a medium format still camera. It has a port where you can pressurize it with a bicycle pump (very low pressure) so that you can detect leaks when you have it underwater. I haven't tested it yet but if it is leaking you will see bubbles. Does the Bolex housing have anything like that?
hirudin
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:58 am
Real name: Jesse Andrewartha
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by hirudin »

Thanks, BAC!

This is the standard spring winding Bolex housing... it's very simple and solid as a rock; you can go 330ft, roughly 10 atmospheres, with it... I've taken it 160ft with no issue and plan to go 250ft in a week or so. There's no ability to pressurize the housing, just a clamp to keep the lid on.

-Jesse-
User avatar
Nicholas Kovats
Posts: 772
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:21 pm
Real name: Nicholas Kovats
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by Nicholas Kovats »

Superb, Jesse! I agree with the prior statement. You are now the pre-eminent 8mm underwater small format cinematographer! I really like the tonality of the white "cauliflower". I suspect you will enjoy the increased resolution of your forthcoming Bolex UltraPan8 2.8 camera in this underwater environment. As will I!

A thought. There has been no new b/w stock developed in the last 30-40 years. You may wish to consider shooting with the ultrafine grain of modern V3 color negatives and convert to b/w in post. "Control" was shot in this manner and the "b/w" cinematography was ethereal.

Great effort.

Nicholas

PS: By the way I really enjoyed your prior 8mm underwater hockey film.
Nicholas Kovats
Shoot film! facebook.com/UltraPan8WidescreenFilm
doug
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:19 pm
Real name: Doug Palmer
Location: Bridport UK
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by doug »

Great, Jesse ! It's strange we are all so used to colour for underwater movies yet monochrome can look beautiful. (Though I was brought up on Hans and Lotti Hass monochrome movies a long time ago :) )
I also have a Bolex housing, got on Ebay, that I intend to test out when the sea warms up a bit. So I'm glad to see your film as I was also thinking of filming with Tri-X. One of the seals leaks a bit, when I tried it in a bucket, but it might just need tightening. Hope so.
Doug
www.filmisfine.co
hirudin
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:58 am
Real name: Jesse Andrewartha
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by hirudin »

Thanks Nicholas,

Yeah, I'll be shooting vision3 250D for principle photography, re-perfed by Edward Nowill. Even on my last project I noticed the difference between the colour and the b+w stock that went beyond the structural differences... it was jarring to go from one to the other, so I'll be keeping to the same stock at the same speed and simply modifying colour in post.

Very excited.

Doug, good luck with your housing... it's so much fun! Hope you can sort out the leak.

-Jesse-
User avatar
Nicholas Kovats
Posts: 772
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:21 pm
Real name: Nicholas Kovats
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by Nicholas Kovats »

Thats great, Jesse. I am looking forward to your 250D fooatge. Now I understand the context for your prior questions. May I ask how many feet you are ordering reperfed from Edward? Are you initially shipping the film from Kodak Canada to the UK? I have found a much cheaper alternative re: international shipping. You can order online via Stanley Productions in the UK. They are located fairly close to Edward in London with very reasonable local shipping. I recently purchased a 400ft roll of V3 200T form Stanley's. Edward has stated that Stanley's film stock prices are cheaper that Kodak UK.

They have Kodak V3 250D 400ft and 100ft single perf 16mm rolls and also 400ft rolls of Fuji ETERNA 250D. You could potentially roll down this roll into 100ft lengths for the Bolex UP8 cam yourself or request assistance from Cineworks in Vancouver (http://www.cineworks.ca/rentals/rates#equipment),

Here are the current offering I mentioned on Stanley's websitei.e.

http://www.stanleysonline.co.uk/product-3415.htm
http://www.stanleysonline.co.uk/product-4962.htm
http://www.stanleysonline.co.uk/product-4125.htm

Cheers!

Nicholas
Nicholas Kovats
Shoot film! facebook.com/UltraPan8WidescreenFilm
grainy
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:51 pm
Real name: Erik Hammen
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by grainy »

beautiful footage.
doug
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:19 pm
Real name: Doug Palmer
Location: Bridport UK
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by doug »

Thanks Jesse :D I was wondering, being a novice re underwater photography etc, if it's still possible to get seals or whatever for these old Bolex housings. :? But first I'll try the spanner. I aim to use a regular old H16 with the 10mm that I hope will connect to the controls. I agree, Nicholas, Stanleys are very good for film and fast delivery too in UK. Whereabouts did you make your film, Jesse ?
Doug
www.filmisfine.co
User avatar
Nicholas Kovats
Posts: 772
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:21 pm
Real name: Nicholas Kovats
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: A regular8 film test: tri-X underwater!

Post by Nicholas Kovats »

Doug,

Jesse appears to have been offline. He shot his footage in British Columbia on Canada's beautiful west coast (Pacific Ocean).

Regards,

Nicholas
Nicholas Kovats
Shoot film! facebook.com/UltraPan8WidescreenFilm
Post Reply