Kodak 7363 exposure?
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
Kodak 7363 exposure?
Hi,
I just exposed a reel of 7363 @ asa 100 instead of asa 10. Is there any point in developing it please?
Thanks,
Ric
I just exposed a reel of 7363 @ asa 100 instead of asa 10. Is there any point in developing it please?
Thanks,
Ric
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:44 pm
- Location: victoria, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
Hi Ric,
Sadly, I don't think so. Indeed, you might try re-shooting on it. You can expect a little bit of the original images you filmed, but only where there were highlights.
rt
Sadly, I don't think so. Indeed, you might try re-shooting on it. You can expect a little bit of the original images you filmed, but only where there were highlights.
rt
I run Nano Lab - Australia's super8 ektachrome processing service
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
Thanks Richard.richard p. t. wrote:Hi Ric,
Sadly, I don't think so. Indeed, you might try re-shooting on it. You can expect a little bit of the original images you filmed, but only where there were highlights.
rt
Bummer - my fault - never mind - however the vendor colour-coded the 7363 as Tri-X and that threw me.
Onward,
Ric
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:15 pm
- Real name: Andre
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
Your exposure would be off by 2.5 stops. That is not all that much.
Depends on the play of the film if there will be images...
Maybe process a clip and push it for two stops? It is 16mm ?
Otherwise run it again and see what arty effects it brings
Depends on the play of the film if there will be images...
Maybe process a clip and push it for two stops? It is 16mm ?
Otherwise run it again and see what arty effects it brings

Kind regards,
André
André
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:44 pm
- Location: victoria, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
But this is not normal panchromatic film. Its high contrast. I think push processing it will produce massive contrast. Only the highlights will have recorded. Pushing will bring thse highlights up, but nothing else.
rt
rt
I run Nano Lab - Australia's super8 ektachrome processing service
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
Thanks. I'll write it off to experience. Are there any development charts for 7363 please? I looked on Digital Truth but could not see it listed?
Ric
Ric
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
My general experience is that most B&W camera film stocks need about 6 minutes in a common developer like D-76 or D-19. With lab stocks like 7363 and 7302, I have found that 2 to 3 minutes is all you need. I've heard some arguments that for low asa lab stocks that you can't really push those stocks, so your only concern is under-developing. Since you can develop these with a red safe light you have the benefit of watching the development and deciding for yourself.
I'd encourage you to re-shoot the film you shot, its double perfed so you can just run it back through a camera without rewinding. You might as well use the film for tests and the double exposure might give some cool, experimental effects.
I'd encourage you to re-shoot the film you shot, its double perfed so you can just run it back through a camera without rewinding. You might as well use the film for tests and the double exposure might give some cool, experimental effects.
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
Many thanks. 3 minutes then. Why is 7363 called a lab stock please? Can I use the b/w Foma processing kit for this film stock?woods01 wrote:With lab stocks like 7363 and 7302, I have found that 2 to 3 minutes is all you need.
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
All kodak stocks that are 52xx/72xx are designed for everyday use in cameras. Stocks that are 33xx/53xx/73xx are specialty stocks used in post-production work like making prints which is why they have such a low ASA. 7363 is meant for creating titles and I think traveling mattes for old school optical printing.
You can use pretty much any developer with any B&W film stock, however films are optimized for different developers and processes though a lot of that is in the eye of the beholder. I've never used a FOMA kit, I use D-19 and make my own bleach, its cheaper. 7363 can be processed as a negative or a positive. But if you are not projecting your original film I'd just develop it as a negative, it will save you some time and you don't need to deal with the nasty bleach!
You can use pretty much any developer with any B&W film stock, however films are optimized for different developers and processes though a lot of that is in the eye of the beholder. I've never used a FOMA kit, I use D-19 and make my own bleach, its cheaper. 7363 can be processed as a negative or a positive. But if you are not projecting your original film I'd just develop it as a negative, it will save you some time and you don't need to deal with the nasty bleach!
Re: Kodak 7363 exposure?
Thanks, I do process b/w film as negative and dig that grainy texture you can getwoods01 wrote:You can use pretty much any developer with any B&W film stock, however films are optimized for different developers and processes though a lot of that is in the eye of the beholder. I've never used a FOMA kit, I use D-19 and make my own bleach, its cheaper. 7363 can be processed as a negative or a positive. But if you are not projecting your original film I'd just develop it as a negative, it will save you some time and you don't need to deal with the nasty bleach!

I find it bizarre that Kodak would axe 7265 Plus X yet maintain these specialty stocks.