that BW looks fab Will.
for me it is not about picking 1 film stock but if i had to make a non Sofie single choice only it would be the Fuji 500.
based on all the footage of the above clip - to be posted soon it performs so incredibly well in low light conditions, the grain seem less apparent than in sunny conditions and it holds high contrast, colour and resolution way below he camera´s reading, actually as long as it samples an image or part of, i mean WAY below and the grain does seemingly not increase noticeably from measurable light conditions.
on the original DV file it is possible to see subtle nuances and details in shadows on the Wannsee building in a way which i have never have with the other film stocks used. i am sure the 160T is a better choice when the light conditions suits and ill check that out as well but i like to piss off many folks by demonstrating the grain to show that I SHOOT FILM FOR HEAVES AKE... ;)
unlike the Kodak Vision Negs it seems to me that the F500 performs best when exposed exactly at its E.I rating. over exposing makes it look flatter especially under daylight condition.
ill post quite some more of the 500 later at the beast quality i can get on the net but there is always a loss in quality from the original file,
in the meantime you may want to check out this V200T extended footage at reasonable quality:
http://vimeo.com/34971839 or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YdPE5zgA1Y
on my machinery the vimeo looks better colour wise.
original upload file is a full quality .mov file on the tube and .m4v on Vimeo
shoot.......