Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

mr_x
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:40 pm
Contact:

Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by mr_x »

Hi,

Recently bid on a 16mm Moviscop viewer. Well it turned up. The rollers are obviously for 8mm film and the slot above the film gate is 8mm wide. I have no knowledge at all of these viewers, can someone please confirm that there is not a magic button somewhere which automatically transforms this item from an 8 to a 16mm viewer?

Another 8mm viewer I do not need :evil:

Thanks,

Ric
super8man
Senior member
Posts: 3980
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 11:51 pm
Real name: Michael Nyberg
Location: The Golden State
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by super8man »

That's a shame - while I do NOT have first hand knowledge, from my research/unsuccessful bidding over the years, they are completely different units. Only did 8 and 16 (separate units) but I have never seen a super 8 version. I was always looking for the 8mm version! Ha.

Cheers,
Mike
My website - check it out...
http://super8man.filmshooting.com/
User avatar
etimh
Senior member
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by etimh »

I have a 16mm moviscop--I didn't even know they made an 8mm version. Never seen one. But hey, if they advertised it wrong, just send it back.

Tim
StoneBuilder
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:29 pm
Real name: David Aspinall
Location: Newcastle, England
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by StoneBuilder »

Yes, they made both gauges and they are separate and different. The 8mm one goes for about fifteen quid, on eBay, while the 16mm goes for maybe thirty - more sometimes if they're in superb condition. They share a varnished baseplate, and winders, and the wood is drilled with different screwholes for each model to keep the film track correct. They are excellent viewers and it's good to have both models maybe ...
mr_x
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by mr_x »

Thanks to Jorg and all! :) It's this one:-

http://www.marriottcameras.co.uk/advert ... viscop.htm

It must be the 8mm version - the vendor hasn't bothered to check which gauge he had to sell. Am now in the process of trying to translate this ghastly muck-up into Italian. Thank goodness for Babelfish! :-o

;)

Ric
mr_x
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by mr_x »

StoneBuilder wrote:Yes, they made both gauges ... They share a varnished baseplate, and winders, and the wood is drilled with different screwholes for each model to keep the film track correct. They are excellent viewers and it's good to have both models maybe ...
Thanks: it looks like the baseplate is for a different version anyway because the viewer sits loosely within the slots in the wooden base. I have several single / dual 8 viewers, I really do not need another one plus I am desperate to film and view 16mm footage from my H16. This fiasco will probably set me back months I fear.

Ric
bolextech
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by bolextech »

Moviscops are OK but a superior viewer is the Moviola M50. Bigger, brighter screen with much less flicker. Has a 8-sided prism I believe.

Cheers,
Jean-Louis
Jean-Louis Seguin
Motion Picture Camera Technician
Montreal, Canada
mr_x
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by mr_x »

bolextech wrote:Moviscops are OK but a superior viewer is the Moviola M50. Bigger, brighter screen with much less flicker. Has a 8-sided prism I believe.

Cheers,
Jean-Louis

Thanks Jean-Louis,

:)

Well I will be looking afresh after the current situation is resolved [sigh].

Ric
super8man
Senior member
Posts: 3980
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 11:51 pm
Real name: Michael Nyberg
Location: The Golden State
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by super8man »

My website - check it out...
http://super8man.filmshooting.com/
mr_x
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by mr_x »

super8man wrote:I love this unit for 16mm work:

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5176/549 ... f3045b.jpg

Image

:o

Can you splice with it?
super8man
Senior member
Posts: 3980
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 11:51 pm
Real name: Michael Nyberg
Location: The Golden State
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by super8man »

Yes, it's built in...but I use a Bolex 16mm splicer. It's simply the best splicer in existence.
My website - check it out...
http://super8man.filmshooting.com/
mr_x
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by mr_x »

super8man wrote:Yes, it's built in...but I use a Bolex 16mm splicer. It's simply the best splicer in existence.
I have that, but the blades are pretty much blunt now - luckily the splicer has always been dual gauge. What is the name of the viewer please?

Thanks,

Ric
super8man
Senior member
Posts: 3980
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 11:51 pm
Real name: Michael Nyberg
Location: The Golden State
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by super8man »

Sorry, thought you would see it on the unit - it's a bell and howell FILMO 16mm editor. Very cool. The rewinds are attached on long metal rods so you really don't need to mount it to wood. But it helps.

Cheers,
Mike
My website - check it out...
http://super8man.filmshooting.com/
mr_x
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Moviscop 16 or 8mm editing viewer?

Post by mr_x »

super8man wrote:Sorry, thought you would see it on the unit - it's a bell and howell FILMO 16mm editor. Very cool. The rewinds are attached on long metal rods so you really don't need to mount it to wood. But it helps.

Cheers,
Mike
Cool, looks quite amazing! ;)

Ric
Post Reply