Kodachrome After Jan. 2011

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

User avatar
LeoStehlik
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:01 pm
Real name: Leo Stehlik
Contact:

Re: Kodachrome After Jan. 2011

Post by LeoStehlik »

mr8mm wrote:So, what happened to the guy in the Czech Republic that was processing Kodachrome?
Hi John, he would be quite happy to process stills (35mm slides) and/or teach me how to do it. However, I did not manage to convince him to consider processing cine Kodachrome film(s), which I can quite understand after being able to see the whole process...
mr8mm
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 7:18 pm
Real name: john schwind
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Kodachrome After Jan. 2011

Post by mr8mm »

Without revealing state secrets, how did he manage to get around the 14 steps necessary to process Kodachrome? I have been told by a number sources that it is impossible. I assume from your comment about cinefilm that processing is not a simple matter. Other than a curiosity why bother to process Kodachroem since there are alternatives for both cinefilm and still work. The only real need would be for those that have sound carts in the freezer. Not abig market most likely.

J.S.
User avatar
wahiba
Posts: 948
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 9:24 am
Real name: David
Location: Keighley, UK
Contact:

Re: Kodachrome After Jan. 2011

Post by wahiba »

If I am not mistaken the complexity of Kodachrome is due to the colour dyes not being within the film. However, the information for the three colours must be within the normally processed film, even if it looks monochrome. So rather than add the colour chemically the solution will probably be to extract the three colour information and from it construct a digital image. As the colour dyes will not have corrupted the photographic grain the result could even be sharper than the original.

Good research project for post graduate digital imaging students?
New web site and this is cine page http://www.picsntech.co.uk/cine.html
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Re: Kodachrome After Jan. 2011

Post by S8 Booster »

..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
carllooper
Senior member
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 am
Real name: Carl Looper
Contact:

Re: Kodachrome After Jan. 2011

Post by carllooper »

wahiba wrote:If I am not mistaken the complexity of Kodachrome is due to the colour dyes not being within the film. However, the information for the three colours must be within the normally processed film, even if it looks monochrome. So rather than add the colour chemically the solution will probably be to extract the three colour information and from it construct a digital image. As the colour dyes will not have corrupted the photographic grain the result could even be sharper than the original. Good research project for post graduate digital imaging students?
Super8 Booster and I have been discussing this in the thread "K40 saviour" but the problem is that if you don't chemically distinguish the layers (using dyes) then you have to do it another way. Physically peel the layers apart? Well no, but that's the problem. The information is there in the BW processed emulsion, but if dyes are not used to distinguish the information in each layer then you need a substitute.

Its not so much a question of possibility vs impossibility, but practicality vs impracticality.

For example there is no reason why you could not use lasers to measure and construct a digital hologram of the emulsion, from which you could then digitally separate the layers and reconstruct a colour image.

This is certainly not impossible but the context in which this might be done is a question mark. In most contexts this would be impractical.

But one appropriate context is simply Art and Experiment.
Carl Looper
http://artistfilmworkshop.org/
Post Reply