..yes the location is great..the roof has windows
in it so I was able to shoot with available light..
the factory are is laaaaaarge with different rooms
check the flickr.com link above for some more pictures of
the location
video will be finished by end of the week
and will also have some plus-x footage
christian
the beauty of tri-x
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
- Rick Palidwor
- Senior member
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 6:02 am
- Real name: Rick Palidwor
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: the beauty of tri-x
I stand corrected. My question now would be, why engage the 85 on b&w film?O. Knights wrote:HI,Rick Palidwor wrote:Small point: when you load a b&w cartridge it disables the 85 filter since the 85 is for colour correction purposes.romeojesus wrote: tri-x, 85filter engaged
Rick
Not on a Leicina Special though (Christian's cam) which you set manually...
Oliver
Rick
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:12 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: the beauty of tri-x
Hi,Rick Palidwor wrote:I stand corrected. My question now would be, why engage the 85 on b&w film?O. Knights wrote:HI,Rick Palidwor wrote: Small point: when you load a b&w cartridge it disables the 85 filter since the 85 is for colour correction purposes.
Rick
Not on a Leicina Special though (Christian's cam) which you set manually...
Oliver
Rick
To change the contrast values!
Oliver
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 4:46 pm
- Contact:
..ok..here is the finished project...
the place where I do my editing switched from premiere to
avid..so this turned out to be my first contact with avid..
I made it an avid 25interlaced project because I felt that
in interlace mode small speed changes looked better than
in 25p mode (had to apply small speed changes, because my
camera does not run at exactly 25fps)...
..while it looked good on tv while cutting the video.. it looks kinda ugly when exported as quicktime or avi to watch
on a computer screen...
next time I will go the 25p route again straight from the beginning
anyway
here is the result which could be much better qualitywise..
(maybe I will reedit it 25p in a few days, but for
now this has to work)
http://stage6.divx.com/user/romeojesus/ ... ofilmkaese
christian
the place where I do my editing switched from premiere to
avid..so this turned out to be my first contact with avid..
I made it an avid 25interlaced project because I felt that
in interlace mode small speed changes looked better than
in 25p mode (had to apply small speed changes, because my
camera does not run at exactly 25fps)...
..while it looked good on tv while cutting the video.. it looks kinda ugly when exported as quicktime or avi to watch
on a computer screen...

next time I will go the 25p route again straight from the beginning
anyway
here is the result which could be much better qualitywise..
(maybe I will reedit it 25p in a few days, but for
now this has to work)
http://stage6.divx.com/user/romeojesus/ ... ofilmkaese
christian
I wouldn't even change the audio speed. If I get a camera that's a little wild, that is if it's within maybe 4%, I'd just do manual cuts to the audio to keep it in sync. Digital stretching makes the audio really grainy and you know already what slight video speed changes do.
BTW, I couldn't play either of the videos you posted even though I have all the necessary plugins etc.
BTW, I couldn't play either of the videos you posted even though I have all the necessary plugins etc.
I may sound stupid, but I hide it well.
http://www.gcmstudio.com
http://www.gcmstudio.com