I tried to pick some shots that didn't have much motion. But these are some WP captures of farting around with the stock in S8, just to give an idea of color and grain in S8. They are not the sharpest, having some intelacing issues in my timeline. Aside from that the projected stuff looks spectacular.
Are you trying to make me depressed? I like the color rendition...I just picked up 250 feet of 100d in regular 8 (500 feet processed) and I look forward to getting some good results as well. Light metering has me worried but I shall give it my best shot.
Cheers,
Mike
My website - check it out...
http://super8man.filmshooting.com/
T-Scan wrote:I tried to pick some shots that didn't have much motion. But these are some WP captures of farting around with the stock in S8, just to give an idea of color and grain in S8. They are not the sharpest, having some intelacing issues in my timeline. Aside from that the projected stuff looks spectacular.
Wow. I sure do hope this stock becomes readily available from Kodak.
I thought there were no interlacing issues with WPs?
I thought there were no interlacing issues with WPs?
It's not the WP, I need to fix something in my properties on my NLE. I think it may be removing the pulldown and causing blurry frame transitions on freeze.
I just picked up 250 feet of 100d in regular 8 (500 feet processed)
Judging the grain structure, R8 100D will most likely be finer grain than S8 64T. The stuff posted here is actually DS8, but I do have 2 fresh pre production S8 carts from Spectra, cut from the same Kodak perfed DS8. Going to shoot it on my camping trip next week. I'm assuming Spectra will have packaged 100D available within a month or so. But unlike the Velvia, there will be a fresh unlimited supply... and 100D is nearly identicle to Velvia in S8, but a stop faster and slightly lower con.
Template: NTSC DV
Field Order: Progressive
Deinterlace Method: Interpolate (you could also use Blend Fields, but I find this softens the image too much).
Make sure your render settings match the project settings. Make sure you use Vegas to apply your speed changes instead of Cinecap.
-Scott
EDIT: BTW, I think your images look perfectly fine. I don't see any interlace artifacts from the posts.
To get rid of the interlace artifacts on "best full" I have to change the properties to 24P. I had accidentally set to remove pulldown on 24P projects from anither project... did my speed change with cinecap, so it may be recognizing it as 24P and removing the pulldown (these still are from unrendered virtual files). I'll get to the bottom of it later when I start some more serious work, but for now I think 100D is a great stock with better color and much finer grain than 64T.
T-Scan wrote:To get rid of the interlace artifacts on "best full" I have to change the properties to 24P....
Actually, the easiest way to get rid of interlace artifacts is to pick a frame that has none. Not all the frames on your timeline will have pulldown. Only certain frames will. Just scoot the cursor to a frame that has no pulldown interlacing and export that frame. No deinterlacing is needed, at that point. It will be a progressive scan frame that you can export at full resolution.
Since this thread seems to be talking alot about frame grabbing and time lines, What editing software are people using?
I personaly use Avid Pro but have yet to edit any film footage with it, still waiting for my first camera to arrive in the mail every day back from uni as i turn my key in the door i am full of excitement of a note sailing i have a parcel
Nice frames! I use Avid Liquid 7, which has a camera-button above the timeline. When you click this button, a snapshot of the current frame is saved to a folder of your own choice. I'd guess many video editing programs have a similar function?
This is how I took this snapshot from a Vision 2 200t test I did some time ago:
Here's another one one of Vision 2 200t on a sunny day.
Love the colors and the grain of the 100D. The 64t were a bit softer, but the colors were very nice on those too. Seems like with the 200t I shot benefited from lots of light, and for logical reasons the grain was much less visible in the grey parts of the image. I haven't added blur in post on these two frames. But I'm sure there are ways to get less grain than I managed, though, both in pre and post.
Would be nice to see a Velvia frame too here?
Last edited by Bjarne Eldhuset on Sat May 26, 2007 1:31 am, edited 3 times in total.