Provia 400 for Super 8?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

richard p. t.
Senior member
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: victoria, Australia
Contact:

Post by richard p. t. »

S8 Booster wrote:shot a few carts of PRO8 custom made P400.
Image
So you shot some Provia 400 in super 8? How well did it transport in the cartridge?
I run Nano Lab - Australia's super8 ektachrome processing service
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
filmamigo
Posts: 272
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by filmamigo »

I think a daylight balanced 400 ASA would be very useful. Available light shooting isn't always under the blazing noon-day sun.

In fact, just today I shot some stills in a restaurant with big windows, predominantly daylight, and I was getting 1/30 sec. exposures at f3.5 on daylight balanced 400 ASA film. Seems like a roll of Super 8 Provia 400 would have been perfect...

A fast daylight-balanced reversal stock would be of great use when shooting weddings -- chapels are often underlit only with daylight, posed photography is often outdoors in the shade, and receptions can be indoors or out and often happen in twilight. Similar conditions might call for it's use in music videos, documentary, or available-light drama. It could be complementary to have a fast daylight stock to go with our fast negative stocks.

400 ASA daylight stock would also be usable with an 80A (CTB) filter -- a 2 stop loss to 100 ASA isn't bad.
David W Scott
Producer / Director
"The Behaviour of Houses"
http://www.behaviourofhouses.com
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Post by S8 Booster »

richard p. t. wrote: So you shot some Provia 400 in super 8? How well did it transport in the cartridge?
not quite good. i tend to belive it was due to lack of lube and high tension film base material. would be ok with post image stabilisation if transfered though.

shoot
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
Angus
Senior member
Posts: 3888
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:22 am
Contact:

Post by Angus »

Honestly...I've done a lot of daylight shooting in super 8 and to be honest I'd not have any use for a film rated at 400ASA.

I find 100D is sometimes off the scale in conditions that I encounter everyday, and 500T (which equates to 320 under daylight) is practically impossible to shoot with in daylight even at f32...
The government says that by 2010 30% of us will be fat....I am merely a trendsetter :)
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Post by S8 Booster »

sort of true but my cam goes to f45 and never peaked out with the F400 and there are polarizers n ND filters avail so its sensitivity should be easy to control.

shoot ;))
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
User avatar
Patrick
Senior member
Posts: 2481
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 3:19 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by Patrick »

"A fast daylight-balanced reversal stock would be of great use when shooting weddings -- chapels are often underlit only with daylight, posed photography is often outdoors in the shade, and receptions can be indoors or out and often happen in twilight."

Kodak make a 500asa daylight negative stock available in 16mm and 35mm which would be ideal for situations like these...that is if negative shooting is your thing.
User avatar
MIKI-814
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:53 pm
Real name: Miguel
Location: BILBAO, Basque Country, EU
Contact:

Post by MIKI-814 »

S8 Booster wrote:sort of true but my cam goes to f45 and never peaked out with the F400 and there are polarizers n ND filters avail so its sensitivity should be easy to control.

shoot ;))
f45 wow!

Anyway, I agree with Angus. If you are thinking of using ND filters, then I do not understand why to shot on 400ASA, unless you are looking for a big grain looking.
filmamigo
Posts: 272
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by filmamigo »

Grain isn't an issue for projects where you are embracing that look -- like weddings where Super 8 was chosen for an aesthetic reason.

Having a high-speed reversal stock is appealing because it's cheaper to process, can be processed in many more labs, and can be nicely transferred by any facility with a WorkPrinter. Negative is much more expensive/demanding on those fronts.

How high a speed you need is debatable, and can depend on factors like your camera. If your favourite camera is a Canon 310XL, then you may not want or need this film. But when you need the exposure lattitude, in a setting where you can't control the light, it's handy to have.

NDs are a simple solution that let you keep shooting with a single roll of film, and remove the NDs as the light changes during the day. I recently read an article in American Cinematographer where the DoP on Apocalypto mentioned that he prefers to shoot Vision2 500T all the time, and simply add or subtract ND on the lens as the conditions require. He likes the look of the film, and can deal with the speed simply.
David W Scott
Producer / Director
"The Behaviour of Houses"
http://www.behaviourofhouses.com
Angus
Senior member
Posts: 3888
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:22 am
Contact:

Post by Angus »

Even using a non-XL camera with a max aperture of f1.8 I still see no circumstances where I'd want a daylight film faster than 100ASA in super 8.

In my experience...if there's enough light to actually see comfortably...then 100D will capture it nicely...
The government says that by 2010 30% of us will be fat....I am merely a trendsetter :)
filmamigo
Posts: 272
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by filmamigo »

Angus wrote:Even using a non-XL camera with a max aperture of f1.8 I still see no circumstances where I'd want a daylight film faster than 100ASA in super 8.

In my experience...if there's enough light to actually see comfortably...then 100D will capture it nicely...
Frankly, I'd be happy with any daylight balanced reversal stock of reasonable speed. 100D right from Kodak would be great :D
David W Scott
Producer / Director
"The Behaviour of Houses"
http://www.behaviourofhouses.com
Angus
Senior member
Posts: 3888
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:22 am
Contact:

Post by Angus »

Just thought I'd say that over easter I was filming in R8 with Fomapan 100. The conditions varied from filming indoors (with natural light from windows) where I was getting exposures of f5.6 to outdoors in sunlight where f22 was over-exposing the film.

So I really don't see where a 400ASA daylight stock would come in useful.

The absolute ideal would be 100D for daylight....and a fast tungsten reversal stock (100~200ASA)...in addition to the neg stocks and B&W.
The government says that by 2010 30% of us will be fat....I am merely a trendsetter :)
Post Reply