a new standard for 64t

[marc]

No, Video is like Water colors and film is like oil painting!

what do you mean? i honestly don't get the analogy.
/matt

Well, you know how bland and transparent water colors look right? And you know the extended range of colors that oil paints give right? And even without comparing the two side by side, I am sure you can imagine al least some reasonable analogy there.

[mattias]

damn, why do i always get the jim jarmusch comment whatever i do. :-)

thanks though. he is indeed my hero.

/matt

[Bjarne Eldhuset]

Mattias: Just saw the clip, and thought it looked stunning. As I'm kind of new to this, could you tell a litte about the lighting?

It seems that 64t really shines under tungsten lighting, and maybe not so much outdoors. Any thougts on that?

Regards,
Bjarne the norseman.

[Uppsala BildTeknik]

kent says it "just gets grainy" when he tweaks it, but when i tell him that at least he *can* tweak it he has to admit i have a point.

/matt

Hehe, OK. ;)
But it does get grainy in those oatmeal shadows. 8)

Now shoot a video with like 50D and I will stop complaining about grain.

[mattias]

i don't know. i like watercolor myself. ink outlines and watercolor coloring. that's art. oil is for spoiled brats with either too big or too broken egos. :-)

/matt

[Nigel]

It is JJ's birthday today...

Good Luck

[marc]

i don't know. i like watercolor myself. ink outlines and watercolor coloring. that's art. oil is for spoiled brats with either too big or too broken egos.

/matt

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I suppose that there are people out there that say the same about people shooting video vs people shooting film!

[mattias]

It seems that 64t really shines under tungsten lighting, and maybe not so much outdoors. Any thougts on that?

i think you're right. it's not the tungsten though, you can easily filter any light to be the right color. i just think it needs careful lighting, like all reversals. for the indoor stuff we used two 2x800w spacelights above the band as key, about a meter up, an 800w redhead with some kind of blue/green theatrical gel as cross, overhead low cri tubes (i.e. green) flagged to spill only on the walls, some cool flicker was a bonus, then another redhead througth a frame of double 216 white diff and on a dimmer mounted on the dolly (well, tripod wheels actually) for fill. oh, and smoke. we couldn't afford a cracker or hazer so we used a regular smoke machine and *waited* and *fanned* and *waited* anf *fanned*. i could have put up my own cash to avoid that. ;-) the walls spotted f/1, the fill read f/1, key f/2, cross probaby f/2 as well, exposed at f/1.4.

the cinematographer's name is david grehn btw. i'm "just" the director.

/matt

[mattias]

Super8 nl currently

yes.

(since the start of 64t)

no. when i had shot my first rolls andec were still doing vnf only. it was frank or across the atlantic.

sends its 64T (and the rest ?) to Andec. It is mentioned on the site somewhere.

/matt

[mattias]

Super8 nl currently

yes.

(since the start of 64t)

no. when i had shot my first rolls andec were still doing vnf only. it was frank or across the atlantic.

sends its 64T (and the rest ?) to Andec. It is mentioned on the site somewhere.

/matt

[T-Scan]

Dam that looks cool! I love it when reversal is dark and saturated. The stills looked pretty grainy, but the clip was just right. Looked just as cool as any 500T i've shot, but different. Makes me wish 64T was 160T with the same look.

[davta9]

i got it processed at Dwaynes. i'm going to get a real transfer when i get back from Florida. that off the wall DV transfer does my footage no justice.

[VideoFred]

Sorry, folks but those stills from Thomas are much much better.
viewtopic.php?t=16011

Fred.

[mattias]

Not to bash his work or anything but you're obviously joking?!? /matt

[VideoFred]

No, for once I'm not joking

Fred.