Hi, rather than blinding my cousins little ones with a floodlite, plan to use the canon 310xl manual focus version, with either 100D or 64t.
Has anyone used 100D or 64t in low lite, as i like the warm look, filming will be done with 64t with the filter in place. Previous xmas filming was done with k40, that came out ok. Will 64t be tooo grainy, can i expect sharp results with 64t.
Xmas 2006 filming, advice needed please
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
If you've used K40 before, it goes without saying that under similar light conditions 64T will have no trouble....obviously neither will 100D as long as you're talking daylight.
I recently shot some footage on board a ferry in the bar using 100D and no filter (fluorescent lighting) and it came out lovely, really captured the atmosphere of the bar.
Personally I much prefer 100D over 64T but the latter is more widely available.
I recently shot some footage on board a ferry in the bar using 100D and no filter (fluorescent lighting) and it came out lovely, really captured the atmosphere of the bar.
Personally I much prefer 100D over 64T but the latter is more widely available.
The government says that by 2010 30% of us will be fat....I am merely a trendsetter 

Re: Xmas 2006 filming, advice needed please
I suggest you just bounce the floodlight off the ceiling. No blinding and the indirect light is very pleasing. That way you'll get proper exposure while still using the low-speed reversal stocks. For home-movie type stuff, I'm a big fan of this method.cineandy wrote:Hi, rather than blinding my cousins little ones with a floodlite,
dr.sanchez, son of a midwestern bureaucrat