Vintage Telecine Machine

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
User avatar
lastcoyote
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:15 am
Real name: Philip Chu
Location: HONG KONG
Contact:

Vintage Telecine Machine

Post by lastcoyote »

When my life finish, every single frame of my films loop my thought…
User avatar
MovieStuff
Posts: 6135
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:07 am
Real name: Roger Evans
Location: Kerrville, Texas
Contact:

Post by MovieStuff »

Actually, it's a door-stop or a paper weight. Why they have it listed in the photography section is beyond me.
User avatar
DriveIn
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 8:52 am
Location: Frostbite Falls
Contact:

Post by DriveIn »

There's much more interesting stuff out there. :wink:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 0056700189
Matthew Buick
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:09 pm
Real name: Joe T Nondescript.
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Contact:

Post by Matthew Buick »

How good would that Goko Telecine Machine be ?
cubsfan45
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:24 pm
Contact:

Post by cubsfan45 »

I found this on the internet in reference to the TC-301/302...
" I worked transferring home movies to video for about 18 years, about 8 years in my own business (now out of the business). This is my opinion about these issues.
I tried many types of projectors, but ended up only using Goko Tc-301s and Tc-302s. These projectors replaced the Goko Tc-20s and are far, FAR, FAAAR superior in image quality. This is understandable because the Tc-20s were based on a cheap revolving prism just like a low end consumer film viewer. Every time the corner of the prism went by you would get a little "pull" in the picture. This pull as the edge goes by 18 or 20 times a second can be noticed in any film viewer, and in transfers made with the Tc-20s. I suffered with these sh#tty machines for two years in the mid eighties before the TC 300 series replaced them. The image in the Tc20s was also not very bright cause the light had to go through the entire prism (about 3 inches thick).

We were getting a lot of complaints with the tc20s and the new units really saved us. No more complaints after the 300 series came on.

Goko never really overcame the bad rep for consumerish quality generated by these early machines. I'm amazed that people are actually buying them still. I can't believe the prices people are paying for these things. They're just crappy modified viewers.

The Tc301s and Tc302s on the other hand are typical telecine projectors with aerial imaging systems (no screen, just like the Tc20s) and they run at 20 fps (with almost no flicker and much brighter images than the TC-20s). In order to handle super 8 sound at this speed (the chipmunk effect) you need a pitch adjusting device like a digital pitchtraq. Speed issues aside these projectors were for me real workhorses and I was very successful for many years using them. They almost never break. Just don't let the tail end of the film go through the gate at the end of the roll as this sometimes results in bent film claws.

Elmo made very good telecine projectors but the transvideo (built in camera) units had horrible quality ccds, even for their day. The units without the built in camera are far superior.

Don't waste your money on Goko Tc-20s or Elmo Transvideos. Buy Tc301s (reg 8) or Tc302s (super 8) or regular Elmo telecine projectors (not transvideo).

Just my two cents, hope it helps someone."
User avatar
BK
Senior member
Posts: 1260
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 11:29 am
Location: Malaysia, TRULY Asia
Contact:

Re: Vintage Telecine Machine

Post by BK »

lastcoyote wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com/Goko-TC301-Super-8- ... dZViewItem

Never heard of it.... 8O
Because you were too young to remember! :roll:

Bill
Post Reply