Vision 200T vs. Ektachrome vs. Pro 8

rubento · Post by **rubento** » Wed Jun 19, 2002 5:30 pm

I would like to hear your comments about how the following stocks compare: Kodak Vision 200T, Pro 8 200T/Pro 8 320T (negative) and Ektachrome VNF 7240. I would telecine them for video use only and the lesser grain the better.

Thank you,

Ruben

Post by **supa_ate_sixteen** » Sat Jun 22, 2002 7:12 pm

Both Kodak 200T and Pro 8mm 200T are the same film stock. The 320T will be more grainy but will allow for 3/4stops more exposure. The Ektachrome will look different because its reversal and will look more of a home movie effect. I would suggest if your going to shoot negative to stick with the 50 ASA pro 8mm.