First post for me on this excellent looking forum.....

I've been borrowing a friend's canon 514 to shoot a few reels and it's been going really well: so far, so good. so i'm now looking to get my own camera and start to push this on a little bit. i am friends with lots of musicians, bands etc and i am looking to shoot some videos for them, just quick, hopefully instinctive shorts that the bands can put up on their websites/myspace/youtube etc etc. i am trying not to get too carried away with it all, but i would like a camera that has the feature set i would like and is good enough to stay with me if i do progress in this field.
so, here's my two (very real) options:
NIZO 561 macro
NIZO 4060
and here's my question:
I think both camera's match my requirements feature-wise, so what advantages would paying almost three times the money (for the 4060) get me? reliability/build quality? image quality (if so, to what extent)? manual controls? low light ability? Does it have 'pro-features' that i may not know about?
I don't mind paying the money if it's worth it, so i'll gratefully listen to any opinions you may have.
Thanks in advance, ad.