Uppsala BildTeknik wrote:
I´m already addicted to this too! :lol:
I think I have somewhere between 23 to 26 250GB drives and maybe 10 160GB drives in a closet (they are too small for me, they just suck up electricity from my computers!)! :lol:
Kent, you need professional help :o
And a private electrical power company
I know. I have serious thoughts about letting the computers get their own eletricity directly "from the connection point", they already have their own fuses in my house but I think this might be even better!
tlatosmd wrote:I wouldn't say analogue video would be that much more archival...
About 15 years ago I was given a 3/4 tape of a live 1979 television broadcast of a football game. The tape still plays fine.
I like the 3/4 inch umatic tape.I'm thinking of purchasing a deck because of the excelent picture I recall seeing about 40 umatic decks for sale at a swapmeet for about $75.
Does sony still make beta-max tapes?
sorry for bringing this topic back up.
Thanks
Rusty
"I think in art, but especially in films, people are trying to confirm their own existences"- Jim Morrison
Betamax is long gone and only marginally better than first generation VHS. U-Matic is much better in all parameters, but the machines are very old and cost about $700 for refubishment (assuming they are working in the first place). And U-Matic tape is bulky. But it's an excellent archival medium for old videos - I've worked with 25 year old U-Matic tapes that still had a good signal. Betacam and Betacam SP are both much better formats than U-Matic; you can find used Betacam decks for pretty cheap - but don't use Beta SP tapes on them, or you'll wreck the heads.