Website update: new layout and clips
Website update: new layout and clips
A new layout and new videos. If its not all up now, it will be in 12 hours or so.
1) The complete INTERIOR, all 35 minutes of it instead of extracts
and
2) A higher res 500x350 version of Winter Water
1) The complete INTERIOR, all 35 minutes of it instead of extracts
and
2) A higher res 500x350 version of Winter Water
Last edited by npcoombs on Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...
i think it looks pretty good, but to be honest, i really dislike the way you present yourself and your work - which, from what i've seen, is good. I would never claim one of my shorts was an 'intense visual experience', that's just not up to me to decide, although it's also a question of modesty. You're not modest. You're probably a very intelligent guy, but you also seem to be really busy with convincing other people you are, as in your 'conversations' or the use of a fancy middle name. I like your text on bela tarr, but it's a little short.
So yeah, nice layout, better than the old one
So yeah, nice layout, better than the old one

We'll knock back a few, and talk about life, and what is right
Re: ...
I know what you are saying, I have been spending so long now writing tv proposals that lapsing into hype and promotion, which really is as opposite to the spirit of my work as is possible, is becoming second nature. I am going to present these films more neutrally.Alex_W wrote:i think it looks pretty good, but to be honest, i really dislike the way you present yourself and your work - which, from what i've seen, is good. I would never claim one of my shorts was an 'intense visual experience', that's just not up to me to decide, although it's also a question of modesty.
In regard to the conversations, if you don't like them or find them useful or interesting, simply do not read them. I have only posted 2 discussions, and they were both revealing enough to be worth making the discourse public. My name is my name. I use it because I like it. It is not Lars Trier adding a von or anything.
Re: ...
nathan von coombs does sound pretty cool thoughnpcoombs wrote: In regard to the conversations, if you don't like them or find them useful or interesting, simply do not read them. I have only posted 2 discussions, and they were both revealing enough to be worth making the discourse public. My name is my name. I use it because I like it. It is not Lars Trier adding a von or anything.
We'll knock back a few, and talk about life, and what is right
- steve hyde
- Senior member
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 1:57 am
- Real name: Steve Hyde
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 2565
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:04 am
- Location: FL
- Contact:
I basically agree with Steve - the text is also not that easy to read against a complex background. I like white or light grey text on a black or dark grey background. The inverse is too much brightness for my oversensitized retinas...
Production Notes
http://plaza.ufl.edu/ekubota/film.html
http://plaza.ufl.edu/ekubota/film.html
- steve hyde
- Senior member
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 1:57 am
- Real name: Steve Hyde
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
-
- Senior member
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:23 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: ...
One might argue though that Lars von Trier does sound better than Lars aus Trier! ;)npcoombs wrote:It is not Lars Trier adding a von or anything.
"Mama don't take my Kodachrome away!" -
Paul Simon
Chosen tools of the trade:
Bauer S209XL, Revue Sound CS60AF, Canon 310XL
The Beatles split up in 1970; long live The Beatles!
Paul Simon
Chosen tools of the trade:
Bauer S209XL, Revue Sound CS60AF, Canon 310XL
The Beatles split up in 1970; long live The Beatles!
- steve hyde
- Senior member
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 1:57 am
- Real name: Steve Hyde
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
I was on a universtiy PC computer with a 17"(??) LCD monitor using the dreadful Internet Explorer.npcoombs wrote:Steve, what browser are you using at what window size?
I have tested the page on Safari and Mozilla down to 800x600 minimum and see not overlapping text?
I think it is an IE problem. I have encountered this type of problem before.
Steve