Another question for the ages...

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply

So??

Lou Reed
8
26%
David Bowie
16
52%
Iggy Pop
4
13%
T-Rex
3
10%
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Post by S8 Booster »

ultramarine wrote:I suggest everyone that hasn't listened to the "Trout Mask Replica" (Beefheart) yet, to do it asap. He must listen to it very carefully and at least 10 times.
Then, we can continue our conversation.
think ive heard it 1000 times :wink:
the trout was trown in my face everytime i visited one or more of my friends at the time. the title probably being the best part of that record.

the thing about beefy and zappa - his compadre was that they spent a lot of resources to trying to make "anti-music" vs the more established and successful mainstream artists.

example is zapps "were only in it for the money" which was a sgt pepper ripoff. zap continued with this at least way into the 80s. i can understand his frustration over not being able to compose play and sell his favourite music: classic which noone could make a living from at the time in the form he wanted.

what he did was going the zap way to make money and to air his frustration over us socitety and other more successful artists by doing it the electric experimental style rock way.

while pretty successful in europe he was banned from us radio. free enterprise up you ass.

as far as i know zap produced the trout and it sold in the wild numbers of 500 000 copies :wink:
beef zap and more were no more than sulking pathetic brats in music history of the day - musically and personally. look at it like an immature youth rebel uproar. i sympathize with zap in his critisim against the us society but when he hit out at other artists - others are dylan and later santana - the thing goes more pathetic.

zap did some good stuff between 75 to mid 80s or so but the sulking undernote remained and in the later years he went classic - disappointing enough blueprinting what he did the rock way years before not taking full advantage of what can be done with philharmonic orchestras.

he got his classic dreams fulfilled but to me with very disappointing results.

beefy? perfect fit for a late youth uproar i guess.

my 2 tinzetown rebellion band centavos.
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

S8 Booster wrote: very nice to not be the lone beatle lunatic on the board :wink:
Well... Here's another one!
Actualy,... forced by my brother.
He's a real Beatles specialist.

But the Beach Boys inspired the Beatles to make Sgt. Peppers.
The 'real' thing for me is Pet Sounds.

We had a band, my brother and I...
'The Original Brothers Band' well know as 'OBB' in the neigbourhood, hehe. He played the guitar, I was the drummer.

So I know something about music structure and believe me, Beach Boys songs are very well structured. Some of them are brilliant. Paul Mc Cartney was knowing that....

Some other favorites of mine:

Steely Dan: my God the musicians they used... The arrangements..

Booker T & The MG's: they played on almost every Stax Soul hit of the sixties: Wilson Picket, Aretha Franklin, Otis Redding etc...

Jimi Hendrickx of cource... but not when he was drunk and/or 'high'.
But he made some very nice very original songs.

Motown! The sound of Motown! It was made in a very simple studio.

About today's music: OK it can be my age but I don't hear much original, refreshing music any more. Everything has been done before...

Fred.
User avatar
Sparky
Senior member
Posts: 1062
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 2:26 am
Real name: Mark
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Sparky »

Definitely Bowie, if only for "the man who sold the world" and that guitar.

But as a great man once said " "To be realistic you barely need anything else, do you?"- The Fall

Mark
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Post by S8 Booster »

VideoFred wrote: About today's music: OK it can be my age but I don't hear much original, refreshing music any more. Everything has been done before...
Fred.
Great. then we are 3!

in 2 lines you sealed what i have tried to tell by several 1000 words :wink:

Beach Boys is a way overlooked band. for anyone having the time to dive into it - awesome. my children are really curious about the pet sounds album. kind of mystic and definately brilliant at the same time. it is truly unique.

anyone wanting to go into them may start with a "simpler" song like Good Vibrations. listen to it several times and you will soon know it is not simple at all. actually extremely complex in a pop package. worse so - their live stage performance of this song - too - was at least as good as the studio version.

i know the other artists you listed too. i think all of them stand well the wear of time well up to this day. my friends bought all these records. however, i had a total 60s hangover until dec8 1980 or so so i could not quite identify me with it as it was kind of a 70s thing.

music used to have a "soul" now everybody is just in it for the money.


i usually divide artists in 2 goups:

1) The wannabees (studio aliens and plastic) 99.999%
2) Those having true musical capacities. (making a club rock)
Last edited by S8 Booster on Mon Oct 24, 2005 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

S8 Booster wrote:

anyone wanting to go into them may start with a "simpler" song like Good Vibrations. listen to it several times and you will soon know it is not simple at all. actually extremely complex in a pop package. worse so - their live stage performance of this song - too - was at least as good as the studio version.
So very true...
Are you referring to the 'Beach Boys in Concert' album?
From the seventies... With Ricky Fataar on the drums.
This was a very impressing life performance.
They even played the Pet Sounds songs life!!

Fred.
Carlos 8mm
Posts: 980
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 11:24 am
Location: going bald!
Contact:

Post by Carlos 8mm »

S8 Booster wrote:
VideoFred wrote: About today's music: OK it can be my age but I don't hear much original, refreshing music any more. Everything has been done before...
Fred.
Great. then we are 3
No, we´re 4!

As Fred said, Seems to be that many things that you can ear today was done many years ago...

The only new sound that I can recognize is the "World Music"or "Mestizo Music". There´s an interesting move in many European cities as Barlcelona, were Inmigrants from woldwide contribute with their own sounds, creating a fresh music, with sounds from Western Europe, Latin America, North Africa, Gipsy music, etc. Anarchical sound similar to the Emir Kusturica´s band No Smoking Orchestra.
Carlos.
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

Carlos 8mm wrote: Latin America, Gipsy music
Ah! Latin America!
There are some very nice Columbian groups.
Very fresh and positive happy sound!
And very good rythm!

And Gipsy Music has always been very 'virtuoso'.
Man, these guitarists are playing whatever they think!
My brothers favorites... He tries to play this, too.

And remember, Django Reinhart could not read music...
He almost lost his hand in a fire....
And a year later he could play even better, with this bad hand!
It was in his mind, where it should be. :lol:

Fred.
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Post by S8 Booster »

VideoFred wrote:
So very true...
Are you referring to the 'Beach Boys in Concert' album?
From the seventies... With Ricky Fataar on the drums.
This was a very impressing life performance.
They even played the Pet Sounds songs life!!

Fred.
not sure - i have only seen those performances on tv originated on film from the 60s i guess. stunning.
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
P.w.Shelton
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:34 am
Location: Woodstock,Ga
Contact:

Music...

Post by P.w.Shelton »

This is a really entertaining thread to read. I love almost everyone one of the artists mentioned here and I'm 29 years young. I LOOOVe the Beatles,Zappa, Lou Reed, Bowie and Beefheart as well as AC/DC and Zepplin's stuff too. Maybe it's because this is how I learned to play music by absorbing everything I could and can. Someone asked me if I preferred Coltrane to Parker once. I just gave a puzzeled look and said "Both".
Sincerely,
Patrick W. Shelton
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Post by S8 Booster »

if nothing else but for the 3 other lunatics:

posted a sound clip from madison square garden 1974, minor unexpected guest appearance on a elton john concert - coupled with the opening of 1964 hollywood bowl concert. some impact 10 years later, band broken up, solo career so - so.

possibly an indication of that the impact reamins - up to this day.
sound clip: madison 1974 - hollywood bowl 1964


as for nigels claim that they were nothing but berryclones:

not complete cronologic order of albums:

(1) please please me: 6 covers of 14 total - no berry
(2) with the beatles: 6 covers of 14 total 1 berry
(3) hard days night: 13 original l/m
(4) beatles for sale: 6 covers of 14 original - 1 berry
(5) help: 2 covers of 15 total - no berry
(6) rubber soul: 2 covers - 12 originals - no berry
(7) revolver: 14 originals
(8) sgt pepper: 13 originals
(9) magical mystery tour: 11 originals
(10)yellow submarine: 13 originals includin 5 by george martin
(11)revolver: 14 originals
(12)the white album: 30 originals
(13)abbey road: 13 originals
(14)let it be: 12 originals.

there should be 2 berrys in 14 albums.
not gone through the singles and ep list but there may be a few there but of all the 29 number 1 singles there are only beatles originals.
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
Carlos 8mm
Posts: 980
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 11:24 am
Location: going bald!
Contact:

Post by Carlos 8mm »

What about "The Beatles live at The Star Club" bootleg, recordend in Hamburg, December 31, 1962?

Love that anarchycal, very punky sound. In those days, the future Sex Pistols still pissed on their beds... :wink:
Carlos.
Carlos 8mm
Posts: 980
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 11:24 am
Location: going bald!
Contact:

Post by Carlos 8mm »

S8 Booster wrote: as for nigels claim that they were nothing but berryclones:

not complete cronologic order of albums:

(1) please please me: 6 covers of 14 total - no berry
(2) with the beatles: 6 covers of 14 total 1 berry
(3) hard days night: 13 original l/m
(4) beatles for sale: 6 covers of 14 original - 1 berry
(5) help: 2 covers of 15 total - no berry
(6) rubber soul: 2 covers - 12 originals - no berry
(7) revolver: 14 originals
(8) sgt pepper: 13 originals
(9) magical mystery tour: 11 originals
(10)yellow submarine: 13 originals includin 5 by george martin
(11)revolver: 14 originals
(12)the white album: 30 originals
(13)abbey road: 13 originals
(14)let it be: 12 originals.

there should be 2 berrys in 14 albums.
not gone through the singles and ep list but there may be a few there but of all the 29 number 1 singles there are only beatles originals.

I think that Berry´s influence is more noticeable in The Rolling Stones than Beatles. (the A side of the Rolling Stones first single was Chuck Berry´s song "Come On" ).

In the early times:
Paul´s more noticeable inflences were Little Richard and Eddie Cochram.

George was a Carl Perkins´s fan.

John was influenced by Elvis and specially Gene Vincent.

Ringo was influenced by....his Mom? :roll:
Carlos.
pinata2000
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:52 am
Contact:

Post by pinata2000 »

I guess I would have to pick david bowie have been a fan ever since I saw jim henson's movie Labyrinth. then I would pick iggy pop 8)
User avatar
VideoFred
Senior member
Posts: 1940
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:15 am
Location: Flanders - Belgium - Europe
Contact:

Post by VideoFred »

Carlos 8mm wrote:
In the early times:
Paul´s more noticeable inflences were Little Richard and Eddie Cochram.

George was a Carl Perkins´s fan.

John was influenced by Elvis and specially Gene Vincent.

Ringo was influenced by....his Mom? :roll:
To continue this Beatles Story: :lol:

They where infuenced in general by American Black music.
Because in Liverpool, they had acces to all these over sea records.

But the very first Stones hit was in fact a Beatles song!!
( I wonna Be Your Man) leadsinger was Ringo on the original.

Fred.
User avatar
S8 Booster
Posts: 5857
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
Real name: Super Octa Booster
Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Contact:

Post by S8 Booster »

Carlos 8mm wrote:What about "The Beatles live at The Star Club" bootleg, recordend in Hamburg, December 31, 1962?

Love that anarchycal, very punky sound. In those days, the future Sex Pistols still pissed on their beds... :wink:
yeah, that is ofcourse how a high-end punkband should sound like.

anyway, i am just as thrilled by the old "schlagers" they play, "red sails in the sunset", "besame mucho", etc. these take proves to full what a widepread range of music they were into and which later was a part of the influence on their own songwriting.

one typical beatles at this time and show is the "kansas city" where they gradually increase the tempo into the insane to piss the dancers/audience off and they have to stop dancing and whistle and booo while the band laugh themeselves to pieces having good fun.

not many know they they were actually a punk band in leather suits beyond the initiation of beatlemania. once they were thrown out of a UK hotel after they had changed from their colarlesses to their preferred leather suits. they were actually the real punks of the time while the stones wanted to be punks and reeally was not.

look at tv interviews from the 60s and you will find 5 very insecure babyfaced stones while the beatles were much more professional from day1.
take a look at jagger at the world live satellite transmitted all over the wolrd final take recording of "all you need is love! in june 1967. a babyfaced jagger on the floor in the "flo-po" audience there.

sidenote:
Bill Wyman and his Rythm Kings? played live in my town a few days ago and got top critics. Peter Frampton, Albert Lee and Georgie Fame joined him on this tour. even the local newspapers´ music critic were blown off his seat and was amazed about something i have known since the day of his birth. those good in the 60s will play and sing the shirt of anybody riding the lists today. Even with their ol original.

thought to go there but the 400 tickets were blown away instantly so no.

they played in our famous small theater with faboulous accoustics:
Part of local newspaper article.

as i missed the simon and garfunkel + everly brother concert here last summer.

funny.
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
Post Reply